首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Why Dichotomies can be Misleading while Dualities Fit the Analysis of Complex Phenomena
【24h】

Why Dichotomies can be Misleading while Dualities Fit the Analysis of Complex Phenomena

机译:为什么在二元性适合复杂现象分析的同时二分法可能会产生误导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Humans’ tendency to classify and categorize is definitely overspread, but it can be misleading at all fields, including epistemology, ontology, theory, and analysis of scientific knowledge construction itself. Sanchez and Loredo (IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science 43:4, 2009—DOI 10.1007/s12124-009-9091-1) in their article on classification of contemporary constructivists fall exactly into such pitfall- even as their effort to make sense of many outstanding theorists is impressive and intriguing. A further analysis, however, points at the theoretical trap posed by such endeavor, for models arisen from different epistemological standpoints cannot be compared along the lines of a simplistic polarity between “objectivism” and subjectivism”. There is much more to be taken into account when a intrinsically complex subject like constructivism and constructionism epistemological approach and their welcome different versions—perspectives—are submitted to analysis and critical evaluation.
机译:人们对分类进行归类的趋势无疑已经蔓延开来,但是在认识论,本体论,理论以及对科学知识建构本身的分析等所有领域都可能产生误导。 Sanchez和Loredo(IPBS:综合心理与行为科学43:4,2009年– DOI 10.1007 / s12124-009-9091-1)在他们关于当代建构主义者分类的文章中恰好陷入了这种陷阱-即使他们努力理解许多杰出的理论家令人印象深刻且令人着迷。然而,进一步的分析指出了这种努力所造成的理论陷阱,因为从不同的认识论立场出发产生的模型不能沿着“客观主义”和“主观主义”之间的简单极性来比较。将诸如建构主义和建构主义认识论方法之类的内在复杂的主题及其受欢迎的不同观点(视角)提交给分析和批判性评估时,还有很多要考虑的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号