首页> 外文期刊>Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science >Three Approaches to the Disjunction Between Psychological Measurement and Psychological Persons: Methodological and Ethical Considerations
【24h】

Three Approaches to the Disjunction Between Psychological Measurement and Psychological Persons: Methodological and Ethical Considerations

机译:心理测度与心理人分离的三种方法:方法论和伦理学的考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we take forward Schwarz’s (2009) disjunction between measurement-apparatus-questionnaire and measurement-apparatus-man to examine how the crisis in contemporary psychology is related to assumptions about two sets of connections in research: connections between research tools, research behaviours, and psychological phenomena; and connections between researchers and researchees. By setting up a research problem with methodological and ethical implications, we describe three approaches that involve different assumptions and research activities in relation to the ways each makes these connections: Disassociated, Conventionally Connected and Persons in Dialogue Approaches. We argue that a Persons in Dialogue Approach is the most appropriate approach for a 21st Century psychology in crisis.
机译:在本文中,我们提出施瓦兹(Schwarz,2009)在测量仪器问卷和测量仪器人之间的分离,以研究当代心理学的危机如何与关于研究中的两套联系的假设相关:研究工具,研究之间的联系行为和心理现象;以及研究人员和被研究人员之间的联系。通过提出具有方法论和伦理学涵义的研究问题,我们描述了三种方法,它们涉及与每种联系方式有关的不同假设和研究活动:分离,常规联系和对话者。我们认为,“对话中的人”方法是21世纪处于危机中的心理学的最合适方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号