首页> 外文期刊>Information economics and policy >Advertising pricing models in media markets: Lump-sum versus per-consumer charges
【24h】

Advertising pricing models in media markets: Lump-sum versus per-consumer charges

机译:媒体市场中的广告定价模型:总价与按消费者的费用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Based on a model of asymmetric competition between a pay and a free media platform, this paper investigates advertising pricing models. The pay media platform generates revenues from media consumers through subscription fees, while the free media platform generates revenues from charging advertisers either on a lump-sum basis (regime A) or on a per-consumer basis (regime B). We show that the free platform produces a higher advertising level and attracts more consumers in regime A than B although advertisers must pay more for ads and consumers dislike ads. Moreover, the pay media platform faces higher subscription fees and lower consumer demand in regime A than B. Compared to regime B, the profit of the free (pay) media platform is higher (lower) in regime A, while aggregate profits are higher only if the consumers' disutility from ads is sufficiently low. In addition, advertisers are better off in regime A than B, while the opposite is true for the media consumers. Finally, in small media markets, social welfare is lower in regime A than B, while this is true in large media markets only if the media consumers' disutility from advertising is sufficiently high.
机译:基于薪酬和免费媒体平台之间的不对称竞争模型,本文研究了广告定价模型。付费媒体平台通过订阅费从媒体消费者那里获得收入,而免费媒体平台则通过一次性支付(广告客户A)或按消费者(广告客户B)向广告客户收费。我们显示,尽管广告商必须为广告支付更多费用并且消费者不喜欢广告,但免费平台产生的广告水平更高,并且在A体制下吸引的消费者比B体制更多。此外,与A制度相比,A制度的付费媒体平台面临更高的订阅费用和更低的消费者需求。与B制度相比,免费(付费)媒体平台的利润在A制度更高(更低),而总利润仅高如果消费者对广告的实用性足够低。此外,在A体制下,广告商的状况要好于B体制,而媒体消费者则相反。最后,在小型媒体市场中,A体制的社会福利低于B体制,而在大型媒体市场中,只有在媒体消费者对广告的实用性足够高的情况下,这才是正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号