首页> 外文期刊>Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics >ENDOGENOUS CHOICE ON ADVERTISING PRICING OF MEDIA PLATFORMS: LUMP-SUM FEE VS. PROPORTIONAL FEE
【24h】

ENDOGENOUS CHOICE ON ADVERTISING PRICING OF MEDIA PLATFORMS: LUMP-SUM FEE VS. PROPORTIONAL FEE

机译:媒体平台广告定价的内生选择:整笔费用VS。比例费用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Media platforms face the choice between lump-sum and proportional fees when they charge advertisers. This paper builds a two-stage dynamic game model to solve an endogenous choice problem with regard to the advertising pricing instruments of two media platforms. If either the proportional fee or the lump-sum fee is feasible, the dominant strategy for both platforms is to charge advertisers a proportional fee. This explains why online media platforms prefer to charge advertisers the proportional fee. We also examine the asymmetric pricing between two platforms that adopt different advertising schemes, which sheds light on the competition between online media and traditional media.
机译:媒体平台向广告商收费时,面临的是一次性付费还是按比例付费。本文建立了一个两阶段的动态博弈模型来解决关于两个媒体平台的广告定价工具的内生选择问题。如果按比例收费或一次性收费可行,则两种平台的主要策略都是向广告客户收取按比例收费。这就解释了为什么在线媒体平台更愿意向广告客户按比例收费。我们还研究了采用不同广告方案的两个平台之间的不对称定价,这揭示了在线媒体和传统媒体之间的竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号