...
【24h】

Reply to Chen et al.

机译:回复Chen等。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To the Editor—We really appreciate the interest of Dr. Chen and colleagues1 in our recent article.2 Several factors may explain the lower rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institutions. It is not the consequence of higher rates of conversion to open cholecystectomy, because we kept converted procedures in their original surgical group. First, note that our institutions adopted the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) system's definition of operative procedure, which excludes outpatient (same-day) surgical procedures.3 Thus, same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomies were excluded from the analysis, lowering the overall proportion of laparoscopic procedures. Furthermore, our increasing use of same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy in recent years, similar to increases in the use of this procedure elsewhere around the world, can account for the apparent reduction in the proportion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy observed in our series over time.
机译:对于编辑-我们非常感谢Chen博士及其同事1在最近的文章中的兴趣。2有几个因素可以解释我们机构腹腔镜胆囊切除术的发生率较低。这不是开腹胆囊切除术转换率更高的结果,因为我们将转换后的手术保留在他们最初的手术组中。首先,请注意,我们的机构采用了国家医院感染监测(NNIS)系统对手术程序的定义,其中不包括门诊(当天)手术程序。3因此,分析排除了当天腹腔镜胆囊切除术,从而降低了总体比例腹腔镜手术。此外,近年来,我们越来越多地使用当天腹腔镜胆囊切除术,这与在世界其他地方使用这种方法的增加类似,可以解释随着时间的推移,在本系列中观察到的腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比例明显减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号