...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Law Journal >The Statutory Recognition Procedure 1999: No Bias in Favour of Recognition?
【24h】

The Statutory Recognition Procedure 1999: No Bias in Favour of Recognition?

机译:1999年法定承认程序:没有偏爱识别的偏见吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The statutory recognition procedure contained in Schedule A1 to the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 came into force in June 2000 and was amended in 2004. In comparison to earlier legislation dealing with recognition, the new procedure was not designed to encourage the spread of collective bargaining. It was shaped, instead, by the Blair Government's wish to take an even-handed approach to the matter of trade union recognition, upholding the freedom of businesses to choose their own methods of communicating with workers, and intervening only where a majority of workers wished a union to be recognised. The result is a statutory recognition procedure which is curiously unbiased in favour of union recognition. According to a recent statement from the ILO's Committee of Experts, the procedure contravenes the ‘Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining’ as protected in Convention 98. In the Committee's opinion, the principle that only unions with the support of a majority of the relevant workers should be recognised is at odds with Convention 98. To bring the procedure into conformity with ILO standards would thus require a rethink of the central premise upon which it is constructed.
机译:1992年《工会与劳资关系(合并)法》附表A1中包含的法定承认程序于2000年6月生效,并于2004年进行了修订。与先前有关承认的立法相比,新程序的设计目的不是鼓励集体谈判的蔓延。相反,它的形成是布莱尔政府希望对工会认可问题采取公正的态度,维护企业自由选择自己与工人沟通的方式的自由,并且仅在大多数工人希望的地方进行干预一个公认的工会。结果是法定承认程序,出于好奇而公正地偏向于工会承认。根据国际劳工组织专家委员会的最近声明,该程序违反了《公约》第98号保护的“组织和集体谈判权”。委员会认为,只有在大多数有关工人的支持下工会的原则应该承认,这与《 98号公约》背道而驰。因此,要使该程序符合国际劳工组织的标准,就需要重新考虑其基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号