首页> 外文期刊>Indian Growth and Development Review >Does money matter in Africa? New empirics on long- and short-run effects of monetary policy on output and prices
【24h】

Does money matter in Africa? New empirics on long- and short-run effects of monetary policy on output and prices

机译:金钱在非洲重要吗?货币政策对产出和价格的长期和短期影响的新经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of monetary policy on economic activity using a plethora of hitherto unemployed financial dynamics in inflation-chaotic African countries for the period of 1987-2010.Although in developed economies, changes in monetary policy affect real economic activity in the short-run, but only prices in the long-run, the question of whether these tendencies apply to developing countries remains open to debate. Design/methodology/approach - Vector autoregresion (VARs) within the frameworks of Vector Error Correction Models and simple Granger causality models are used to estimate the long- and short-run effects, respectively. A battery of robustness checks are also used to ensure consistency in the specifications and results. Findings - The tested hypotheses are valid under monetary policy independence and dependence, except few exceptions. H1: Monetary policy variables affect prices in the long-run but not in the short-run. For the first-half (long-run dimension) of the hypothesis, permanent changes in monetary policy variables (depth, efficiency, activity and size) affect permanent variations in prices in the long-term. But in cases of disequilibriums, only financial dynamic fundamentals of depth and size significantly adjust inflation to the cointegration relations. With respect to the second-half (short-run view) of the hypothesis, monetary policy does not overwhelmingly affect prices in the short-term. Hence, but for a thin exception, H1 is valid. H2: Monetary policy variables influence output in the short-term but not in the long-term. With regard to the short-term dimension of the hypothesis, only financial dynamics of depth and size affect real gross domestic product output in the short-run. As concerns the long-run dimension, the neutrality of monetary policy has been confirmed. Hence, the hypothesis is also broadly valid. Practical implications - A wide range of policy implications are discussed. Inter alia: the long-run neutrality of money and business cycles, credit expansions and inflationary tendencies, inflation targeting and monetary policy independence implications. Country-/regional-specific implications, the manner in which the findings reconcile the ongoing debate, measures for fighting surplus liquidity and caveats and future research directions are also discussed. Originality/value - By using a plethora of hitherto unemployed financial dynamics (that broadly reflect monetary policy), we provide significant contributions to the empirics of money. The conclusion of the analysis is a valuable contribution to the scholarly and policy debate on how money matters as an instrument of economic activity in developing countries.
机译:目的-本文的目的是使用通货膨胀混乱的非洲国家(1987-2010年)迄今为止大量的失业金融动态来研究货币政策对经济活动的影响。尽管在发达经济体中,货币政策的变化会短期内的实际经济活动,但从长远来看只有价格,这些趋势是否适用于发展中国家的问题尚待辩论。设计/方法/方法-在矢量错误校正模型和简单的Granger因果关系模型框架内的矢量自回归(VAR)分别用于估计长期影响和短期影响。还使用了一系列的耐用性检查来确保规格和结果的一致性。研究结果-除少数例外情况外,经过检验的假设在货币政策独立性和依赖性下均有效。假设1:货币政策变量从长远来看会影响价格,但短期不会。对于该假设的上半部分(长期维度),货币政策变量(深度,效率,活动和规模)的永久性变化会长期影响价格的永久性变化。但是,在不平衡的情况下,只有深度和规模的金融动态基础才能显着调整通货膨胀以达到协整关系。关于该假设的后半部分(短期观点),货币政策在短期内不会对价格产生巨大影响。因此,除了一个很小的例外,H1是有效的。假设2:货币政策变量会在短期内影响产出,但不会影响长期。关于假说的短期维度,只有深度和规模的金融动态会影响短期的实际国内生产总值。关于长期性,货币政策的中立性已得到确认。因此,该假设也广泛适用。实际意义-讨论了广泛的政策意义。除其他外:货币和商业周期的长期中立,信贷扩张和通货膨胀趋势,通货膨胀目标和货币政策独立性的影响。还讨论了国家/地区特定的含义,调查结果与正在进行的辩论相吻合的方式,应对剩余流动性和警告的措施以及未来的研究方向。原创性/价值-通过使用迄今大量的失业金融动态(广泛反映货币政策),我们为货币经验做出了重要贡献。分析的结论为有关货币如何作为发展中国家经济活动的工具的学术和政策辩论做出了宝贵的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号