首页> 外文学位 >Monetary Policy Shocks and Their Effects on Business Borrowings, Aggregate Output, and Prices.
【24h】

Monetary Policy Shocks and Their Effects on Business Borrowings, Aggregate Output, and Prices.

机译:货币政策冲击及其对企业借贷,总产出和价格的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Developed from previous financial acceleration research, this thesis employs two VAR (vector-auto regression) systems to measure monetary policy shocks and their effects. The first uses the conventional Cholesky method and the second uses the methods developed by Bernanke and Blinder (1992) and Bernanke and Mihov (BM 1998). I use the federal funds rate and as the two monetary policy instruments in the VAR systems.;With the Cholesky method, net financial borrowings rise (fall) for about one year after contractionary (easy) monetary policy shocks. This is consistent with what has been found by Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Evans (CEE 1996). The responses of corporate sector appear to explain the entire business sector, with no significant results found from the impulse responses of the other two sectors (noncorporate and farm). With the BM model, easing policy shocks lead to an initial fluctuation within the first half of year and the prolonged decrease in borrowings after half of year. The responses of borrowings in the BM model demonstrate different amplitudes and patterns from the Cholesky method following the policy shocks, this is from the structural shocks are defined differently in these two VARs. However, the decreases (rise) in borrowings after the easy (tight) monetary shocks are the same. In both systems, there is a significant expansion of real GDP following monetary easing. The price puzzle, that price levels are positively related to monetary tightening, does not appear in the plots of impulse response functions with the Cholesky method but they appear in some versions of the BM model.;(JEL classification: E52, G30);Key Words: Monetary Transmission Mechanism, Financial Acceleration, VAR Model, Flow of Funds, Federal Funds Rate, Nonborrowed Reserves, Price Puzzle.
机译:本文是在先前的金融加速研究的基础上发展起来的,它采用两个VAR(向量-自动回归)系统来衡量货币政策冲击及其影响。第一种使用常规的Cholesky方法,第二种使用Bernanke和Blinder(1992)以及Bernanke和Mihov(BM 1998)开发的方法。我使用联邦基金利率作为VAR系统中的两个货币政策工具。通过Cholesky方法,在收缩(宽松)货币政策冲击后,净金融借款在大约一年内上升(下降)。这与Christiano,Eichenbaum和Evans(CEE 1996)的发现是一致的。公司部门的反应似乎可以解释整个业务部门,而其他两个部门(非公司和农场)的冲动反应均未发现重大结果。使用BM模型,宽松的政策冲击会导致上半年的初始波动,并导致半年后的借款长期减少。在政策冲击之后,BM模型中的借贷响应显示出与Cholesky方法不同的幅度和模式,这是由于在这两个VAR中结构性冲击的定义不同。但是,在宽松的(紧缩的)货币冲击之后,借款的减少(增加)是相同的。在这两个系统中,货币放松后,实际GDP均大幅增长。关于价格水平与货币紧缩正相关的价格难题,并未出现在使用Cholesky方法的冲激响应函数图中,但出现在BM模型的某些版本中。(JEL分类:E52,G30);关键词语:货币传导机制,金融加速,VAR模型,资金流向,联邦基金利率,非借入准备金,价格难题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yao, Yao.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 101 p.
  • 总页数 101
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号