...
首页> 外文期刊>Impact assessment and project appraisal >Integrating environmental impact, contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis: empirical evidence for an alternative perspective
【24h】

Integrating environmental impact, contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis: empirical evidence for an alternative perspective

机译:整合环境影响,或有估值和成本效益分析:替代观点的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The non-market nature of water quality improve- ment in rives hinders the use of traditional cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to measure the effi- ciency of investments. Substantial investments have been made to clean up contaminated river water with little comparison of the cots or environmental im- pact (EI) with future benefits. Water quality impact models are used in this study to predict the impact of discharges on downstream water quality. Contin- gent valuation (CV) is used to measure the total value, including use and non-use, of river water quality improvement. This provides the benefit side of the cost-benefit equation. The method outlined provides a tool to evaluate investment on environ- mental improvement integrating EI and CV and CBA.
机译:水质改善的非市场性质阻碍了使用传统的成本效益分析(CBA)来衡量投资效率。人们已经进行了大量投资来清理受污染的河水,很少将婴儿床或环境影响(EI)与未来的收益进行比较。本研究使用水质影响模型来预测排放对下游水质的影响。权变估值法(CV)用于衡量河流水质改善的总价值,包括使用和不使用。这提供了成本效益方程式的优势。概述的方法提供了一种工具,用于评估将EI,CV和CBA整合在一起的环境改善投资。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号