首页> 外文期刊>IIC:International review of intellectual property and competition law >Software Agreements: Stocktaking and Outlook - Lessons from the UsedSoft v. Oracle Case from a Comparative Law Perspective
【24h】

Software Agreements: Stocktaking and Outlook - Lessons from the UsedSoft v. Oracle Case from a Comparative Law Perspective

机译:软件协议:清点与展望-从比较法的角度看UsedSoft诉Oracle案的教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The legal nature of software agreements, in particular on the delivery of standard software, has become one of the most debated issues among software law experts in continental Europe. In particular, the tradability of software via online services raises legal questions for both software suppliers and customers. This paper provides a legal overview of approaches adopted by some EU Member States (Germany, France and England) and the legal framework in the United States. Further it analyses the characteristics of software, principally with a view to copyright law in comparison to patent law. The authors conclude that the ECJ's UsedSoft v. Oracle decision confirms that agreements on the delivery of software have to be qualified as licence agreements - irrespective of whether online technologies or offline "sales" apply. The paper further reflects on the decision's impact on cloud computing as well as on contracts related to other copyright-protected digital content.
机译:软件协议的法律性质,特别是关于标准软件的交付,已经成为欧洲大陆软件法律专家中争议最大的问题之一。特别是,通过在线服务进行软件的可交易性给软件供应商和客户都提出了法律问题。本文提供了一些欧盟成员国(德国,法国和英国)采用的方法的法律概述以及美国的法律框架。此外,它主要从版权法与专利法的角度分析软件的特性。作者得出的结论是,无论使用在线技术还是离线“销售”,ECJ的UsedSoft诉Oracle判决均确认,必须将有关软件交付的协议视为许可协议。本文进一步反映了该决定对云计算以及与其他受版权保护的数字内容有关的合同的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号