首页> 外文期刊>IETE Journal of Research >Stability Analysis in Top-Contact and Side-Contact Graphene Nanoribbon Interconnects
【24h】

Stability Analysis in Top-Contact and Side-Contact Graphene Nanoribbon Interconnects

机译:顶部接触和侧面接触石墨烯纳米带互连的稳定性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, we have analysed the relative stability of copper, top-contact (TC) and side-contact (SC) multilayer graphene nanoribbon (MLGNR)-based interconnects for next-generation VLSI interconnect technology. We have analysed the Bode stability by varying the interconnect length (10-100 mu m) at 16 nm ITRS technology node. Similar analysis has been performed by varying the interconnect width (11-22 nm) at 10 mu m interconnect length. It is observed that by increasing the interconnect length (l) as well as interconnect width (w), the relative stability increases for three different types of interconnects. Our analysis shows that the copper-based interconnect shows more stability due to high gain margin and phase margin for a wide range of interconnect length (10-100 mu m) as compared to the TC-GNR and SC-GNR interconnect systems. It is also observed that by increasing the wire width, the gain and phase margin of TC-GNR is higher than copper and SC-GNR interconnect. Our analysis predicts that the TC-GNR is the best candidate for interconnect modelling in terms of stability across different technology nodes considering the other benefits of TC-GNR as compared with copper and SC-GNR.
机译:在本文中,我们分析了用于下一代VLSI互连技术的铜,基于顶部接触(TC)和侧面接触(SC)的多层石墨烯纳米带(MLGNR)的互连的相对稳定性。我们通过改变16 nm ITRS技术节点处的互连长度(10-100μm)分析了Bode稳定性。通过改变互连长度为10μm的互连宽度(11-22 nm),可以进行类似的分析。可以观察到,通过增加互连长度(l)和互连宽度(w),对于三种不同类型的互连,相对稳定性会提高。我们的分析表明,与TC-GNR和SC-GNR互连系统相比,由于铜的互连在较大的互连长度范围(10-100μm)中具有较高的增益裕度和相位裕度,因此稳定性更高。还可以观察到,通过增加线宽,TC-GNR的增益和相位裕度高于铜和SC-GNR互连。我们的分析预测,考虑到TC-GNR与铜缆和SC-GNR相比的其他优势,就跨不同技术节点的稳定性而言,TC-GNR是互连建模的最佳人选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号