首页> 外文期刊>IEICE Transactions on Communications >A Comparison on Capacity Requirement of Optical WDM Mesh Network Protection Strategies
【24h】

A Comparison on Capacity Requirement of Optical WDM Mesh Network Protection Strategies

机译:WDM网状网络保护策略容量需求的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents a comprehensive investigation of three optical wavelength-division multiplexed (WDM) rnesh network protection approaches, namely minimal cost, single link basis and disjoint path approaches. The operation of each approach is described and their performances are extensively evaluated and compared. Key aspects that are taken into the consideration and comparison of the designs include a spare capacity requirement, ease of operation and practical feasibility. A mathematical model based on integer linear programming is introduced to obtain a lower bound on the spare capacity requirement for full protection against all single link failures. Two heuristic algorithms have also been developed to perform wavelength resource allocation under both normal and failure conditions for both systems with and without wavelength conversion capability. It is shown that the minimal cost approach can accomplish the lowest extra cost requirement for protection, but this approach is considered not appropriate for practical applications due to complicated restoration and management. The single link basis scheme is on the other hand more practical and very cost efficient. For the disjoint path technique, the cost for spare capacity is generally slightly greater than that of the single link basis scheme. Its main advantages lie in the simple re-configuration and inherent protection against node failure for in-transit traffic. Finally, a new framework for obtaining a good spare capacity cost estimate of a mesh restorable network is presented.
机译:本文对三种光波分复用(WDM)网络保护方法进行了全面的研究,即最小成本,单链路基础和不相交路径方法。描述了每种方法的操作,并对它们的性能进行了广泛的评估和比较。设计的考虑和比较的关键方面包括备用容量要求,易于操作和实际可行性。引入了基于整数线性规划的数学模型,以获取备用容量需求的下限,以针对所有单链路故障提供全面保护。对于具有和不具有波长转换功能的两个系统,还开发了两种启发式算法来在正常和故障条件下执行波长资源分配。结果表明,最低成本的方法可以实现保护所需的最低额外成本,但是由于复杂的恢复和管理,该方法不适合实际应用。另一方面,单链路基础方案更加实用且非常具有成本效益。对于不相交路径技术,备用容量的成本通常略高于单链路基础方案的成本。它的主要优点在于简单的重新配置和固有的针对传输中流量的节点故障的保护。最后,提出了一种新的框架,用于获得网格可恢复网络的良好备用容量成本估算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号