首页> 外文期刊>Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on >Different Strokes for Different Folks: Visual Presentation Design between Disciplines
【24h】

Different Strokes for Different Folks: Visual Presentation Design between Disciplines

机译:不同人群的不同笔触:学科之间的视觉呈现设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We present an ethnographic study of design differences in visual presentations between academic disciplines. Characterizing design conventions between users and data domains is an important step in developing hypotheses, tools, and design guidelines for information visualization. In this paper, disciplines are compared at a coarse scale between four groups of fields: social, natural, and formal sciences; and the humanities. Two commonplace presentation types were analyzed: electronic slideshows and whiteboard “chalk talks”. We found design differences in slideshows using two methods - coding and comparing manually-selected features, like charts and diagrams, and an image-based analysis using PCA called eigenslides. In whiteboard talks with controlled topics, we observed design behaviors, including using representations and formalisms from a participant’s own discipline, that suggest authors might benefit from novel assistive tools for designing presentations. Based on these findings, we discuss opportunities for visualization ethnography and human-centered authoring tools for visual information.
机译:我们提供了一项民族志研究,研究各学科之间在视觉表现形式上的设计差异。表征用户和数据域之间的设计约定是为信息可视化开发假设,工具和设计指南的重要一步。在本文中,学科在四个领域之间进行了粗略的比较:社会科学,自然科学和形式科学;以及自然科学。和人文科学。分析了两种常见的演示类型:电子幻灯片演示和白板“粉笔演讲”。我们使用两种方法在幻灯片显示中发现了设计差异-编码和比较手动选择的特征(例如图表和图表),以及使用PCA进行基于图像的分析(称为特征幻灯片)。在具有受控主题的白板讨论中,我们观察了设计行为,包括使用参与者自己学科的表示形式和形式主义,这表明作者可能会从新颖的辅助工具中受益,以设计演示文稿。基于这些发现,我们讨论了可视化人种学和视觉信息以人为中心的创作工具的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号