...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing >Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery
【24h】

Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery

机译:高光谱影像中光谱不同信号源数量的估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With very high spectral resolution, hyperspectral sensors can now uncover many unknown signal sources which cannot be identified by visual inspection or a priori. In order to account for such unknown signal sources, we introduce a new definition, referred to as virtual dimensionality (VD) in this paper. It is defined as the minimum number of spectrally distinct signal sources that characterize the hyperspectral data from the perspective view of target detection and classification. It is different from the commonly used intrinsic dimensionality (ID) in the sense that the signal sources are determined by the proposed VD based only on their distinct spectral properties. These signal sources may include unknown interfering sources, which cannot be identified by prior knowledge. With this new definition, three Neyman-Pearson detection theory-based thresholding methods are developed to determine the VD of hyperspectral imagery, where eigenvalues are used to measure signal energies in a detection model. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods, two information criteria, an information criterion (AIC) and minimum description length (MDL), and the factor analysis-based method proposed by Malinowski, are considered for comparative analysis. As demonstrated in computer simulations, all the methods and criteria studied in this paper may work effectively when noise is independent identically distributed. This is, unfortunately, not true when some of them are applied to real image data. Experiments show that all the three eigenthresholding based methods (i.e., the Harsanyi-Farrand-Chang (HFC), the noise-whitened HFC (NWHFC), and the noise subspace projection (NSP) methods) produce more reliable estimates of VD compared to the AIC, MDL, and Malinowski's empirical indicator function, which generally overestimate VD significantly. In summary, three contributions are made in this paper, 1) an introduction of the new definition of VD, 2) three Neyman-Pearson detection theory-based thresholding methods, HFC, NWHFC, and NSP derived for VD estimation, and 3) experiments that show the AIC and MDL commonly used in passive array processing and the second-order statistic-based Malinowski's method are not effective measures in VD estimation.
机译:高光谱传感器具有很高的光谱分辨率,现在可以发现许多未知信号源,这些信号源无法通过目视检查或先验识别。为了解决此类未知信号源,我们引入了一个新定义,在本文中称为虚拟维数(VD)。它定义为从目标检测和分类的角度描述高光谱数据特征的光谱不同信号源的最小数量。它与常用的固有维数(ID)不同,因为信号源仅由提议的VD基于其独特的频谱特性来确定。这些信号源可能包括未知干扰源,无法通过先验知识加以识别。利用这个新定义,开发了三种基于Neyman-Pearson检测理论的阈值确定方法来确定高光谱图像的VD,其中特征值用于在检测模型中测量信号能量。为了评估所提出方法的性能,考虑了两种信息标准(信息标准(AIC)和最小描述长度(MDL))以及Malinowski提出的基于因子分析的方法进行比较分析。正如计算机仿真所证明的,当噪声独立地均匀分布时,本文研究的所有方法和准则都可能有效地起作用。不幸的是,当其中一些应用于实际图像数据时,情况并非如此。实验表明,与基于特征阈值的三种方法(即Harsanyi-Farrand-Chang(HFC),噪声白HFC(NWHFC)和噪声子空间投影(NSP)方法)相比,VD估计均更可靠。 AIC,MDL和Malinowski的经验指标函数通常会高估VD。总而言之,本文做出了三点贡献:1)介绍了VD的新定义; 2)三种基于Neyman-Pearson检测理论的阈值方法,用于VD估计的HFC,NWHFC和NSP;以及3)实验表明无源阵列处理中常用的AIC和MDL以及基于二阶统计量的Malinowski方法并不是VD估计中的有效措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号