...
首页> 外文期刊>Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on >Comparison of Cloud-Screening Methods Applied to GOSAT Near-Infrared Spectra
【24h】

Comparison of Cloud-Screening Methods Applied to GOSAT Near-Infrared Spectra

机译:GOSAT近红外光谱云筛查方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several existing and proposed satellite remote sensing instruments are designed to derive concentrations of trace gases, such as carbon dioxide $(hbox{CO}_{2})$ and methane $(hbox{CH}_{4})$, from measured spectra of reflected sunlight in absorption bands of the gases. Generally, these analyses require that the scenes be free of cloud and aerosol, necessitating robust screening algorithms. In this work, two cloud-screening algorithms are compared. One applies threshold tests, similar to those used by the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS), to visible and infrared reflectances measured by the Cloud and Aerosol Imager aboard the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). The second is a fast retrieval algorithm that operates on high-resolution spectra in the oxygen A-band measured by the Fourier Transform Spectrometer on GOSAT. Near-simultaneous cloud observations from the MODIS Aqua satellite are used for comparison. Results are expressed in terms of agreement and disagreement in the identification of clear and cloudy scenes for land and non-sun glint viewing over water. The accuracy, defined to be the fraction of scenes that are classified the same, is approximately 80% for both algorithms over land when comparing with MODIS. The accuracy rises to approximately 90% over ocean. Persistent difficulties with identifying cirrus clouds are shown to yield a large fraction of the disagreement with MODIS.
机译:设计了几种现有的和拟议的卫星遥感仪器,以从测量得到的痕量气体浓度,例如二氧化碳$(hbox {CO} _ {2})$和甲烷$(hbox {CH} _ {4})$气体吸收带中反射的太阳光的光谱。通常,这些分析要求场景中没有云雾和气溶胶,因此需要可靠的筛选算法。在这项工作中,比较了两种云筛选算法。一种方法是将阈值测试(类似于MODerate分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)所使用的阈值测试)应用于温室气体观测卫星(GOSAT)上由Cloud and Aerosol Imager测量的可见光和红外反射率。第二种是快速检索算法,该算法对由GOSAT傅立叶变换光谱仪测量的氧气A波段的高分辨率光谱进行操作。来自MODIS Aqua卫星的近乎同时的云观测用于比较。在确定晴朗和多云的场景以识别陆地和非阳光闪烁水上时,结果以同意和不同表示。与MODIS相比,两种算法在陆地上的精度均定义为分类为相同场景的比例,约为80%。整个海洋的精度提高到大约90%。在识别卷云方面遇到的持续困难已显示出与MODIS意见分歧的很大一部分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号