首页> 外文期刊>IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking >Carry-over round robin: a simple cell scheduling mechanism for ATM networks
【24h】

Carry-over round robin: a simple cell scheduling mechanism for ATM networks

机译:结转轮询:用于ATM网络的简单信元调度机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We propose a simple mechanism named carry-over round robin (CORR) for scheduling cells in asynchronous transfer mode networks. We quantify the operational complexity of CORR scheduling and show that it is comparable to that of a simple round-robin scheduler. We then show that, albeit its simplicity, CORR is very competitive with much more sophisticated and significantly more complex scheduling disciplines in terms of performance. We evaluate the performance of CORR using both analysis and simulation, We derive analytical bounds on the worst case end-to-end delay achieved by a CORR scheduler for different traffic arrival patterns. Using traffic traces from MPEG video streams, we compare the delay performance of CORR with that of packet-by-packet generalized processor sharing (PGPS) and stop-and-go (SG). Our results show that, in terms of delay performance, CORR compares favorably with both PGPS and SG. We also analyze the fairness properties of CORR and show that it achieves near perfect fairness.
机译:我们提出了一种简单的机制,称为随身携带循环(CORR),用于在异步传输模式网络中调度信元。我们量化了CORR调度的操作复杂性,并表明它与简单的循环调度程序相当。然后,我们表明,尽管性能很简单,但CORR在性能上要复杂得多,调度也要复杂得多,因此非常有竞争力。我们使用分析和仿真来评估CORR的性能。我们得出了针对不同流量到达模式的CORR调度程序实现的最坏情况下的端到端延迟的分析范围。使用来自MPEG视频流的流量跟踪,我们将CORR的延迟性能与逐包通用处理器共享(PGPS)和即停即走(SG)的性能进行了比较。我们的结果表明,就延迟性能而言,CORR优于PGPS和SG。我们还分析了CORR的公平性,并表明它实现了近乎完美的公平性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号