...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Management Review >Commentary on: 'Talent-innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management'
【24h】

Commentary on: 'Talent-innate or acquired? Theoretical considerations and their implications for talent management'

机译:评论:“天赋还是后天?理论考量及其对人才管理的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper provides a commentary on the article in this special issue by Meyers, van Woerkom, and Dries (2013-this issue) on the meaning of the term 'talent' with a particular focus on the extent to which talent is an innate construct (nature), mostly acquired (nurture), or more based on an interaction of the two. While acknowledging Meyers et al.'s comprehensive and convincing overview of the differing perspectives on talent as innate versus acquired, we expand on their ideas in two important ways. Firstly, moving beyond debates on the exclusivity versus inclusivity of conceptualizations, we argue that the key focus for organizations should be on maximizing value creation through calibrating the level of talent required by the organization and ensuring that talents are deployed in those strategic jobs with the greatest potential for value creation. Secondly we touch on the translation of talent into performance in the organizational context by bring the import of context to the fore. We conclude with some directions for further study.
机译:本文对Meyers,van Woerkom和Dries(2013年本刊)在本期特刊中的文章提供了评论,该文涉及``人才''一词的含义,并特别关注人才是先天建构的程度(自然),大多是后天获得的(培育),或者更多是基于两者的相互作用。尽管承认梅耶斯(Meyers)等人对先天或后天人才的不同观点的全面而令人信服的概述,但我们以两种重要方式扩展了他们的观点。首先,我们超越了关于概念化的排他性与包容性的辩论,我们认为,组织的主要重点应该是通过校准组织所需的人才水平并确保将人才部署到具有最大潜力的战略性工作中来最大程度地创造价值。创造价值的潜力。其次,我们通过将环境的重要性引入来触及将人才转化为组织环境中的绩效。我们总结了一些进一步研究的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号