首页> 外文期刊>Human Resource Development International >Analysing HRD research in the UK research excellence framework
【24h】

Analysing HRD research in the UK research excellence framework

机译:在英国卓越研究框架中分析HRD研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The state of Human Resource Development (HRD) research can be assessed in various ways. This paper presents a descriptive analysis of HRD in the UK 2014 Research Excellence Framework (REF2014), establishing how it is represented within the UK's national research assessment system. HRD is a relatively new field of study in the UK, and globally, but features in many business schools. HRD is represented in the REF mainly in the Unit of Assessment (UOA) 19 - Business and Management Studies, and specifically under the sub- theme: management development and management education. We determine the extent to which HRD research has been included in REF2014 by identifying the number of institutions submitting HRD research outputs and HRD impact case studies in UOA19. We also identify the types of outputs and number of HRD journals included in submissions. Our analyses suggest that most institutions submitted HRD outputs, amounting to around 4% of the total and the majority were published in non-HRD journals. We challenge the widespread use of the 'ABS list' to rate/select submitted outputs, identify implications for a range of stakeholders in HRD and offer recommendations for further research.
机译:人力资源开发(HRD)研究的状态可以通过各种方式进行评估。本文对英国2014研究卓越框架(REF2014)中的HRD进行了描述性分析,确立了它在英国国家研究评估体系中的代表方式。人力资源开发是英国乃至全球范围内一个相对较新的研究领域,但在许多商学院中都有特色。人力资源开发在REF中的代表主要是评估单位(UOA)19-商业与管理研究,尤其是在子主题:管理发展和管理教育中。通过确定提交UOA19中提交HRD研究成果和HRD影响案例研究的机构数量,我们确定HR2014研究被纳入REF2014的程度。我们还将确定提交内容中包含的产出类型和HRD期刊数量。我们的分析表明,大多数机构都提交了人力资源开发的产出,约占总数的4%,并且大多数是在非人力资源期刊上发表的。我们对“获取和惠益分享清单”的广泛使用提出挑战,以评估/选择提交的产出,确定对人力资源开发中一系列利益相关者的影响,并为进一步研究提供建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号