首页> 外文期刊>Higher Education >Some implications of ‘public/private’ space for professional identities in higher education
【24h】

Some implications of ‘public/private’ space for professional identities in higher education

机译:“公共/私人”空间对高等教育专业身份的一些启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The interplay of public and private sector dynamics in higher education has impacted not only on the roles and identities of academic staff, but also on those of professional staff, who often have the task of bringing together, and achieving congruence between, activities that are geared towards the public good and also towards more commercially oriented enterprise. In this context, a new cadre of “blended professionals” has emerged, whose roles include initiatives associated with the social responsibilities of institutions to their communities, as well as more market-oriented, income generating projects (Whitchurch 2008, 2009). This paper reports on case material relating to a sub-set of these staff, working specifically in the area of Community and Business Partnership, and on the impact of their work for traditional management structures and relationships. It will be argued that, although unlikely to be acknowledged in formal accounts of the university such as organisation charts or institutional plans, these staff are responsible for providing and maintaining a framework that holds together more publicly oriented strands of activity, such as widening participation, with more privately oriented strands, such as enterprise. In so doing, they make extensive use of multi-professional team- and networking with a range of colleagues, both inside and outside the university, not only helping to re-balance their institutions, but also to protect them against undue organisational fragmentation and bureaucracy. They therefore contribute to an increasingly ‘mixed economy’ of broadly based portfolios of activity. The implications of these ‘public/private’ spaces and activities for professional identities are explored in the context of institutional management.
机译:公立和私立部门在高等教育中的相互作用不仅影响了学术人员的角色和身份,而且还影响了专业人员的角色和身份,而专业人员通常肩负着将开展的活动结合起来并使其相互协调的任务走向公共利益,也走向更加商业化的企业。在这种情况下,出现了一个由“混合专业人员”组成的新干部,其作用包括与机构对社区的社会责任相关的倡议,以及更多面向市场的创收项目(Whitchurch 2008,2009)。本文报告了与这些员工的子集有关的案例材料,这些案例材料专门在社区和商业伙伴关系领域工作,以及他们的工作对传统管理结构和关系的影响。可以争论的是,尽管这些工作人员虽然不太可能在组织结构图或机构计划之类的大学正式账目中得到承认,但他们仍负责提供和维持一个框架,该框架将更多面向公众的活动(例如扩大参与范围,拥有更多面向私人的部门,例如企业。通过这样做,他们充分利用了多专业团队,并与大学内部和外部的许多同事建立了联系,不仅有助于重新平衡其机构,而且还可以保护他们免受不必要的组织分散和官僚主义的影响。 。因此,它们为基础广泛的活动组合的日益“混合经济”做出了贡献。这些“公共/私人”空间和活动对职业身份的影响在制度管理的背景下进行了探讨。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号