首页> 外文期刊>Heart >A meta-analysis comparing fhe prognostic accuracy or six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery
【24h】

A meta-analysis comparing fhe prognostic accuracy or six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery

机译:一项荟萃分析,比较了大血管手术患者的预后准确性或六项诊断测试对围手术期心脏风险的预测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the discriminatory value and compare the predictive performance of six non-invasive tests used for perioperative cardiac risk stratification in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. Design: Meta-analysis of published reports. Methods: Eight studies on ambulatory electrocardiography, seven on exercise electrocardiography, eight on radionuclide ventriculography, 23 on myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, eight on dobutamine stress echocardiography, and four on dipyridamole stress echocardiography were selected, using a systematic review of published reports on preoperative non-invasive tests from the Medline database (January 1975 and April 2001). Random effects models were used to calculate weighted sensitivity and specificity from the published results. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate and compare the prognostic accuracy of each test. The relative diagnostic odds ratio was used to study the differences in diagnostic performance of the tests. Results: In all, 8119 patients participated in the studies selected. Dobutamine stress echocardiography had the highest weighted sensitivity of 85% (95% confidence interval (CI) 74% to 97%) and a reasonable specificity of 70% (95% CI 62% to 79%) for predicting perioperative cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction. On SROC analysis, there was a trend for dobutamine stress echocardiography to perform better than the other tests, but this only reached significance against myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (relative diagnostic odds ratio 5.5, 95% CI 2.0 to 14.9). Conclusions: On meta-analysis of six non-invasive tests, dobutamine stress echocardiography showed a positive trend towards better diagnostic performance than the other tests, but this was only significant in the comparison with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. However, dobutamine stress echocardiography may be the favoured test in situations where there is valvar or left ventricular dysfunction.
机译:目的:评估在进行大血管手术的患者围手术期心脏风险分层中使用的六种非侵入性检查的鉴别价值并比较其预测性能。设计:已发布报告的荟萃分析。方法:系统地回顾了术前非手术前已发表报告的系统评价,选择了八项动态性心电图研究,七项运动性心电图研究,八项放射性核素心室描记法,八项心肌灌注显像图研究,八项多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图研究,四项双嘧达莫负荷超声心动图研究。 Medline数据库提供的侵入性测试(1975年1月和2001年4月)。随机效应模型用于根据已发表的结果计算加权敏感性和特异性。摘要接收器操作特征(SROC)曲线分析用于评估和比较每个测试的预后准确性。相对诊断比值比用于研究测试诊断性能的差异。结果:总共有8119名患者参加了所选研究。多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图的最高加权敏感性为85%(95%置信区间(CI)74%至97%),合理的特异性为70%(95%CI 62%至79%),用于预测围手术期心脏死亡和非心脏衰竭。致命性心肌梗塞。在SROC分析中,多巴酚丁胺应力超声心动图有比其他测试更好的趋势,但这仅对心肌灌注闪烁显像具有显着意义(相对诊断比值比为5.5,95%CI为2.0至14.9)。结论:在对六项非侵入性检查的荟萃分析中,多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图显示出比其他检查更好的诊断性能的积极趋势,但这仅在与心肌灌注显像法进行比较时才有意义。但是,多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图可能是存在瓣膜功能异常或左心功能不全的情况下的首选检查方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号