首页> 外文期刊>Heart >Tissue Doppler velocity is superior to strain imaging in predicting long-term cardiovascular events after cardiac resynchronisation therapy
【24h】

Tissue Doppler velocity is superior to strain imaging in predicting long-term cardiovascular events after cardiac resynchronisation therapy

机译:在预测心脏再同步治疗后的长期心血管事件时,组织多普勒速度优于应变成像

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To examine the predictive value of systolic dyssynchrony measured by tissue Doppler velocity versus tissue Doppler strain imaging on long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). Design: Cohort study. Setting: Two university hospitals. Patients: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients (65 (SD 12) years, 76% males) who underwent CRT. Interventions: Baseline echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and clinical follow-up for 37 (20) months. Main outcome measures: The time to peak systolic velocity during ejection phase (T_s) and the time to peak systolic strain (T_ε) were assessed for dyssynchrony, that is the maximal delay in Ts and the maximal delay in T_ε among the four left ventricular basal segments. Occurrence of cardiovascular endpoints between patients with and without dyssynchrony was compared by Kaplan-Meier curves, followed by Cox regression analysis for potential predictor(s). Results: There were 78 (33%) deaths, with cardiovascular causes in 64 (27%) patients, while 136 (57%) patients were hospitalised for cardiovascular events, including decompensated heart failure in 87 (36%) patients. Patients with the maximal delay in T_s of ≥ 65 ms showed a lower event rate for cardiovascular mortality (19% vs 38%, logrank χ~2 = 7.803, p = 0.005) and other prognostic endpoints. In Cox regression analysis, the maximal delay in T_s (hazard ratio (HR) 0.463, 95% Cl 0.270 to 0.792, p = 0.005) and ischaemic aetiology (HR 2.716, 95% Cl 1.505 to 4.901, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of cardiovascular mortality. In contrast, the maximal delay in T_ε of ≥ 80 ms failed to predict any cardiovascular event. Conclusions: Echocardiographic evidence of prepacing systolic dyssynchrony measured by TDI velocity, but not TDI strain, predicted lower long-term cardiovascular events after CRT.
机译:目的:探讨组织多普勒速度对比组织多普勒应变成像测量的心脏收缩不同步对心脏再同步治疗(CRT)后长期预后的预测价值。设计:队列研究。地点:两所大学医院。患者:接受CRT的239例患者(65岁(SD 12),男性占76%)。干预措施:基线超声心动图与组织多普勒成像(TDI)和临床随访37(20)个月。主要结局指标:评估射血期达到收缩期峰值速度的时间(T_s)和达到收缩期峰值应变的时间(T_ε)的不同步性,即左心室四个基底中Ts的最大延迟和T_ε的最大延迟。段。通过Kaplan-Meier曲线比较了有和没有同步不良的患者之间的心血管终点发生率,然后进行了Cox回归分析以寻找潜在的预测指标。结果:64(27%)位患者中有78位(33%)死于心血管原因,而136位(57%)患者因心血管事件而住院,包括87位(36%)患者失代偿性心力衰竭。 T_s的最大延迟≥65 ms的患者显示出较低的心血管事件发生率(19%比38%,logrankχ〜2 = 7.803,p = 0.005)和其他预后终点。在Cox回归分析中,T_s的最大延迟(危险比(HR)0.463,95%Cl 0.270至0.792,p = 0.005)和缺血性病因(HR 2.716,95%Cl 1.505至4.901,p = 0.001)是独立的预测因子心血管死亡率。相反,T_ε的最大延迟≥80 ms无法预测任何心血管事件。结论:超声心动图证据显示,通过TDI速度而非TDI应变测量的收缩压不同步,可以预示CRT后长期心血管事件的发生。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Heart》 |2009年第13期|1085-1090|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China;

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China;

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China;

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China;

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China;

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands;

    Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Institute of Vascular Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, PR China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号