首页> 外文期刊>Greece & Rome >THE GENERAL’S PRE-BATTLE EXHORTATION IN GRAECO-ROMAN WARFARE
【24h】

THE GENERAL’S PRE-BATTLE EXHORTATION IN GRAECO-ROMAN WARFARE

机译:平民在希腊罗马战争中的预谋

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The first-century-AD philosopher Onasander (Strategikos 1.13, 15) comments that a general must be a good and effective speaker in order to encourage his men before battle, and ancient historians on occasion have commanders address large audiences of soldiers in an age when there was no artificial amplification of the human voice. In 1993, and reiterated in 1998, Mogens Hansen argued that the extensive pre-battle ‘speech’ found in our sources was, if given at all, only ‘a few apophthegms that could be shouted by the general as he traversed the line, or a speech made to the officers only who passed it on to the soldiers’. He accepts that a general often addressed his troops in camp or in parade formation; his objection solely relates to those speeches ostensibly given immediately before battle to troops already arrayed for combat. For Hansen, ‘a brief exhortation of the troops, unit by unit, while the commander walked along the front is probably all the historical reality [one] may expect to find behind the fully-fledged speeches reported by the historians’, these being a ‘literary composition and not the historian's report of a speech which had actually been made’. In Hanson's view, unless the harangues were given to troops in camp, or to individual units in battle formation, or, perhaps, to small military forces, these speeches could not have been given as reported. With respect to the last possibility, Hansen only rather reluctantly acknowledges that Thrasybulus' speech delivered to approximately 1000 Athenian insurgents in 404 BC, and reported by Xenophon (Hell. 2.4.10–12), ‘is possibly right’.
机译:公元一世纪的哲学家奥纳桑德(Strategikos 1.13,15)评论说,将军必须是一个良好而有效的演说家,以便在战斗前鼓励他的士兵,而古代历史学家有时会要求指挥官在这个时代向广大士兵讲话。没有人为放大声音。 1993年,并在1998年重申,莫根斯·汉森(Mogens Hansen)辩称,如果我们给出的话,在我们的资料来源中发现的广泛的战斗前的“言语”,只有“一些将军在穿越战线时可能会大喊大叫,或者仅向将其传递给士兵们的军官发了言。他接受将军经常在营地或游行队伍中向部队讲话;他的反对意见只与那些在战斗前即刻向已经准备战斗的部队发表的演讲有关。对于汉森来说,“对部队进行一次简短的劝告,而司令员沿着前线行走,可能是[历史]可能会发现的所有历史现实[一个人]可能会发现历史学家们发表的全面演说的背后',这是“是文学作品,而不是历史学家的演讲报告”。在汉森看来,除非把这次破坏行动给予营地的部队,或给予战斗编队的个人部队,或者也许给予小型军事部队,否则这些话就不会如所报道的那样发表。关于最后一种可能性,汉森只是勉强地承认,Thrasybulus的讲话在公元前404年发给了大约1000名雅典叛乱分子,并由色诺芬(Heno。2.4.10–12)报告说,“可能是正确的”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Greece & Rome》 |2010年第1期|p.304-318|共15页
  • 作者

    EDWARD ANSON;

  • 作者单位

    emanson@ualr.edu;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 14:00:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号