首页> 外文期刊>Granular matter >Grain-size analysis of fine and coarse non-plastic grains: comparison of different analysis methods
【24h】

Grain-size analysis of fine and coarse non-plastic grains: comparison of different analysis methods

机译:细和粗非塑性晶粒的粒度分析:不同分析方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Grain size is a fundamental property of earth materials. Many techniques for measuring grain size exist, and elucidating the relationships among the different analysis techniques is valuable for understanding what constitutes grain size. In this study, grain-size distributions obtained through dry-mode digital particle imaging using optical microscopy, laser diffraction (LD), and hydrometer sieving (HS) were compared. For most of the investigated samples, the three methods yielded similar size distributions. When performing dry-mode particle optical imaging (DMPOI) measurements of grain size, we recommend using high dispersion pressure. The grain-size distribution curves of finer sands were shifted toward coarser particles in the DMPOI analysis results, compared to the LD and HS results. In contrast, the grain-size distribution curves of glass beads (irrespective of size) were similarly shaped in all three cases. The fractions of sand and silt sizes were relatively consistent among the three methods, but were smaller in the DMPOI results than in the LD and HS results. The median particle size (8-280 A mu m) was similar among the three methods. DMPOI yielded a lower standard deviation than the other methods. In the HS analysis of the mica sample (consisting of platy layer particles), the curve was clearly shifted toward finer particles, and the granulometric characteristics differed significantly from those obtained using the other methods. Therefore, the three methods appear to differ mainly in terms of their physical interpretations of "grain size" and the effects of the distribution width and high-sensitivity circularity of the particles.
机译:粒度是地球材料的基本属性。存在许多测量晶粒尺寸的技术,阐明不同分析技术之间的关系对于了解什么是晶粒尺寸非常有价值。在这项研究中,通过使用光学显微镜,激光衍射(LD)和比重计筛分(HS)的干式数字粒子成像获得的晶粒尺寸分布进行了比较。对于大多数研究样本,这三种方法产生了相似的尺寸分布。在执行晶粒尺寸的干式粒子光学成像(DMPOI)测量时,我们建议使用高分散压力。与LD和HS结果相比,DMPOI分析结果中较细砂的粒度分布曲线向较粗颗粒移动。相反,在所有三种情况下,玻璃珠的粒度分布曲线(与尺寸无关)均具有相似的形状。在这三种方法中,沙和粉粒的大小比例相对一致,但是DMPOI结果比LD和HS结果小。在这三种方法中,中值粒径(8-280μm)相似。 DMPOI产生的标准偏差低于其他方法。在云母样品(由板状层颗粒组成)的HS分析中,曲线明显移向较细的颗粒,并且粒度特性与使用其他方法获得的值明显不同。因此,这三种方法的主要区别在于“粒度”的物理解释以及颗粒的分布宽度和高灵敏度圆形度的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号