首页> 外文期刊>Global public health >How federal health-care policies interface with urban and rural areas: A comparison of three systems
【24h】

How federal health-care policies interface with urban and rural areas: A comparison of three systems

机译:联邦医疗保健政策如何与城市和农村地区对接:三种系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Global public health policies span national borders and affect multitudes of people. The spread of infectious disease has neither political nor economic boundaries, and when elevated to a status of pandemic proportions, immediate action is required. In federal systems of government, the national level leads the policy formation and implementation process, but also collaborates with supranational organisations as part of the global health network. Likewise, the national level of government cooperates with sub-national governments located in both urban and rural areas. Rural areas, particularly in less developed countries, tend to have higher poverty rates and lack the benefits of proper medical facilities, communication modes and technology to prevent the spread of disease. From the perspective of epidemiological surveillance and intervention, this article will examine federal health policies in three federal systems: Australia, Malaysia and the USA. Using the theoretical foundations of collaborative federalism, this article specifically examines how collaborative arrangements and interactions among governmental and non-governmental actors help to address the inherent discrepancies that exist between policy implementation and reactions to outbreaks in urban and rural areas. This is considered in the context of the recent H1N1 influenza pandemic, which spread significantly across the globe in 2009 and is now in what has been termed the 'post-pandemic era'.
机译:全球公共卫生政策跨越国界,影响着许多人。传染病的传播既没有政治界限,也没有经济界限,当上升到大流行程度时,需要立即采取行动。在联邦政府系统中,国家级领导政策制定和实施过程,但也与超国家组织合作,作为全球卫生网络的一部分。同样,国家政府与城市和农村地区的地方政府合作。农村地区,特别是欠发达国家,往往有较高的贫困率,并且缺乏适当的医疗设施,通讯方式和技术来预防疾病的传播。从流行病学监测和干预的角度,本文将研究澳大利亚,马来西亚和美国这三个联邦系统中的联邦卫生政策。本文使用合作联邦制的理论基础,专门研究了政府和非政府行为体之间的合作安排和互动如何帮助解决政策实施与城乡地区爆发疾病之间的内在差异。在最近的H1N1流感大流行中考虑了这种情况,2009年H1N1流感大流行在全球范围内,现在正处于所谓的“大流行后时代”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号