...
首页> 外文期刊>Global environmental change >Including Multiple Differing Stakeholder Values Into Vulnerability Assessments Of Socio-ecological Systems
【24h】

Including Multiple Differing Stakeholder Values Into Vulnerability Assessments Of Socio-ecological Systems

机译:在社会生态系统的脆弱性评估中​​纳入多个不同的利益相关者价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A method is proposed for assessing the vulnerability of socio-ecological systems that is explicitly linked to multiple stakeholder values enabling multiple assessments of vulnerability in the same or different locations. Three key features distinguish this method. Firstly, multiple ecosystem services are each identified and valued by multiple stakeholders. Secondly, a series of matrices are used to quantitatively and sequentially link social and ecological information from an initial, scenario-based ecosystem change stimulus through to judgements about changes in ecosystem services. Thirdly, ecosystem properties that underlie the delivery of the ecosystem services are incorporated into the scenario projections. The framework is illustrated using data from two study sites in France and Portugal examining vulnerability of selected stakeholders to prospective land-use changes for 2030. Assessment results show stakeholders such as farmers and conservation agency groups (groups common to the two sites) or hunters in Portugal and hikers in France differ in their vulnerability to land-use change. Our explanation for this reflects our overall proposal that assessments of vulnerability are inescapably contextual and usually multiple, being mediated at the very least by the values and particular relationships that are assigned between people and their environment in a given location.
机译:提出了一种评估社会生态系统脆弱性的方法,该方法与多个利益相关者价值明确相关,从而可以对相同或不同位置的脆弱性进行多次评估。此方法区别于三个关键特征。首先,多个生态系统服务分别由多个利益相关者识别和评价。其次,使用一系列矩阵将社会和生态信息定量地和顺序地连接起来,从基于情景的初始生态系统变化刺激到对生态系统服务变化的判断。第三,将构成生态系统服务交付基础的生态系统特性纳入情景预测中。通过使用来自法国和葡萄牙的两个研究点的数据来说明该框架,该数据检查了选定利益相关者对2030年未来土地利用变化的脆弱性。评估结果显示,利益相关者,例如农民和保护机构团体(这两个地方共有的团体)或猎人。葡萄牙和法国的远足者在改变土地用途方面的脆弱性有所不同。我们对此的解释反映了我们的总体建议,即对脆弱性的评估不可避免地取决于上下文,并且通常是多重的,至少要由在给定位置的人与环境之间分配的价值和特定关系来进行调节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号