首页> 外文期刊>German History >A ‘Moral Mandate’ for Occupation: The British Churches and Voluntary Organizations in North-Western Germany, 1945–1949
【24h】

A ‘Moral Mandate’ for Occupation: The British Churches and Voluntary Organizations in North-Western Germany, 1945–1949

机译:职业的“道德授权”:1945年至1949年德国西北部的英国教堂和志愿组织

获取原文
       

摘要

Recent military interventions by the West highlight persistent and unresolved problems regarding future foreign policy. Reconsidering the wider legacy and precedent of the British occupation of Germany from 1945 is critical in understanding these debates. Addressing a neglected topic, this article examines whether Britain reconciled its liberal democratic values as an occupying power, and in particular how its government tried to invoke the Christian ‘moral mandate’ of the British churches and voluntary organizations as an instrumental feature of policy, part of its civilizing mission in Germany. Central to this, however, were manifest contradictions between the churches’ rhetorical efforts to help the presentation of the moral case for military rule, and a policy vacuum that offered few practical measures to help German civilians, and especially expellees and refugees. Moreover, Britain's claims of moral leadership were at odds with its decision to delegate refugee matters to the German authorities. There were major differences in approach by church leaders, Whitehall ministers and civilian administrators in Germany in assessing how magnanimous to be in their treatment of Germany. With greater unanimity of purpose, humanitarian initiatives might have had greater success and become a more uniting symbol for reconciliation. The main failing was in the churches’ inability to modify government policy. Compassionate rhetoric and humanitarian relief efforts could not repair the damage caused by earlier political decisions to marginalize forced migrants that effectively punished them as Germans, a legacy of the occupation often sidestepped in order to focus on greater British achievements.
机译:西方国家最近的军事干预突显了有关未来外交政策的持续和未解决的问题。重新考虑1945年英国占领德国的广泛遗产和先例对理解这些辩论至关重要。针对一个被忽略的话题,本文探讨了英国是否调和了其作为占领国的自由民主价值观,特别是其政府如何试图将基督教徒对英国教会和志愿组织的“道德授权”作为政策的工具性特征,部分在德国的文明使命。然而,与此相关的中心问题是,在教会为表达军事统治的道义案例所做的言辞努力与政策真空之间存在明显的矛盾,该政策真空几乎没有提供任何实际措施来帮助德国平民,尤其是驱逐出境者和难民。此外,英国声称道德上的领导权与将难民事务委托给德国当局的决定相矛盾。德国的教会领袖,白厅大臣和文职行政人员在评估对待德国的态度时有很大的不同。随着目标的更大程度的一致,人道主义举措可能会取得更大的成功,并成为和解的更加团结的象征。主要的失败是教会无法修改政府政策。富有同情心的言辞和人道主义救济努力无法弥补早期政治决定对被迫移民的边缘化所造成的破坏,这些政治决定使作为德国人的强迫移民受到了惩罚,占领的传统常常为了集中精力争取更大的英国成就而回避。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号