首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Seeing The Local In The Global: Political Ecologies, World-systems, And The Question Of Scale
【24h】

Seeing The Local In The Global: Political Ecologies, World-systems, And The Question Of Scale

机译:在全球范围内看地方:政治生态,世界体系和规模问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Scale, as concept, has featured prominently in political ecology and remains, even if implicitly, a crucial point of analytical reference. Recent studies, drawing from both human geography and ecology, have sought to demonstrate how scales, rather than pre-existing ontologically. are both socially and environmentally produced. Given the different scales through which social and environmental processes occur, the study of society-environment relations can be improved by analysing varying scalar configurations of interaction. This recent and promising methodological corrective would greatly benefit from a dialogue with world-systems approaches, which integrate diverse scale-producing processes and to some extent overlap in scope with political ecology. World-systems perspectives, by focusing on the long-term systemic character of people-environment relations, effectively connect micro- to macro-scale social and ecological processes and explain long-term internal dynamics and interrelations of systems at different scales. Conversely, world-systems approaches could learn much from political ecologists' consideration of nonhuman processes into understandings of scale and society-environment relations, which has a long tradition in geography, as well as from the more context-sensitive analytical framework brought to those understandings. Case studies are discussed to demonstrate not only how these two perspectives could be integrated, but also how explanations of environmental change can be thereby improved. Combining the two approaches provides the basis for a more ecologically oriented world-systems paradigm and, in political ecology, for greater sensitivity to socially large-scale systemic processes and, given the originally anti-capitalist underpinnings of both paradigms, for more political coherence.
机译:作为概念,规模在政治生态学中具有突出的地位,即使隐含地,仍然是分析参考的关键点。最近从人类地理学和生态学两个方面进行的研究试图证明规模是如何实现的,而不是在本体论上预先存在的。是社会和环境的产物。鉴于发生社会和环境过程的规模不同,可以通过分析相互作用的不同标量配置来改善对社会与环境关系的研究。与世界体系方法的对话将极大地受益于这种最新且有希望的方法学纠正措施,该方法整合了各种规模生产过程,并且在一定程度上与政治生态学存在重叠。通过关注人与环境关系的长期系统特征,世界系统的观点有效地将微观与宏观的社会和生态过程联系起来,并解释了长期的内部动力和不同规模系统的相互关系。相反,世界体系的方法可以从政治生态学家对非人类过程的考虑中吸取很多教训,以了解对规模和社会环境关系的了解,这在地理上具有悠久的传统,并且可以从对这些认识的更上下文相关的分析框架中学习。讨论了案例研究,不仅展示了如何将这两种观点融合在一起,而且还展示了如何改善对环境变化的解释。两种方法的结合为更加生态化的世界体系范式提供了基础,并且在政治生态学中为对社会大规模系统过程更加敏感提供了基础,并且考虑到两种范型最初具有反资本主义的基础,它们也提供了更大的政治连贯性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号