首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >How does law make place? Localisation, translocalisation and thing-law at the world's, first factory
【24h】

How does law make place? Localisation, translocalisation and thing-law at the world's, first factory

机译:法律是如何产生的?全球第一家工厂的本地化,跨本地化和物联网

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article examines how law is implicated in the formation of place, and how place in turn can shape law. It is an empirical explication of Latour's call for researchers to study the global through its local instantiations. Drawing upon recent theoretical work in both material culture studies and legal geography the article examines the interplay of law and material formations at one originating site, Sir Richard Arkwright's Cromford Mills in Derbyshire in order to examine the creation and circulation of a new form of place in the late eighteenth century: the industrial scale cotton mill. It shows how a diverse range of legal elements ranging across patent law, the Calico Acts and ancient local Derbyshire lead mining laws all helped to shape that place-form, its proliferation across the United Kingdom, and ultimately further afield. In doing so the article conceptualises processes of localisation, translocalisation and thing-law by which the abstractions of both place-forms and law elements become activated through their pragmatic local emplacement. Whilst the case study concerns 200 year old place-making machinations, many of the spatio-legal articulations of Arkwright and his opponents have a surprisingly modern feel about them. The paper therefore advocates the benefits of a longitudinal, historical approach to the study of place-making, and in particular, calls for a greater attentiveness in legal geography to law's role in the intentional formation of (work)places by their owners. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文研究法律如何与场所的形成有关,以及场所如何形成法律。这是拉图尔(Latour)呼吁研究人员通过局部实例研究全局的经验性说明。本文借鉴物质文化研究和法律地理学方面的最新理论工作,研究了理查德·阿克赖特爵士在德比郡的克伦福德·米尔斯(Cromford Mills)在一个起源地的法律与物质形成之间的相互作用,以研究在该地的一种新形式的创造和流通。十八世纪末:工业规模的棉纺厂。它显示了专利法,《印花布法》和古代当地的德比郡铅矿开采法等各种法律要素如何帮助塑造了这种场所形式,其在英国乃至整个地区的扩散。在此过程中,本文对本地化,跨本地化和物法的过程进行了概念化,通过这些过程,地方形式和法律元素的抽象通过它们的务实的局部放置而被激活。尽管该案例研究涉及200多年的地方造假行为,但Arkwright及其对手的许多时空法律表述对其具有令人惊讶的现代感。因此,本文主张采用纵向的,历史性的方法来研究场所营造的好处,尤其是要求在法律地理领域中更加关注法律在其所有者有意形成(工作)场所中所扮演的角色。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geoforum》 |2016年第8期|182-191|共10页
  • 作者

    Bennett Luke;

  • 作者单位

    Sheffield Hallam Univ, Dept Nat & Built Environm, Norfolk 306,City Campus,Howard St, Sheffield S1 1WB, S Yorkshire, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号