首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >Conservation and development 2.0: Intensifications and disjunctures in the politics of online 'do-good' platforms
【24h】

Conservation and development 2.0: Intensifications and disjunctures in the politics of online 'do-good' platforms

机译:养护与发展2.0:在线“做善事”平台的政治中的激进与脱节

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

An increasing amount of interactive '2.0' crowdsourcing platforms raise awareness and funds for conservation and development projects worldwide. By enabling two-way online collaboration and communication, these 'conservation and development 2.0' platforms hoped to provide new impetus and popular legitimacy for conservation and development initiatives in the face of budget cuts and general criticism of the 'formal' aid sector after the financial crisis. This paper presents the case of the flagship 'elephant corridor' project on the Dutch pifworld.com platform to investigate whether and how the '2.0' element has changed conservation and development in line with these expectations. The paper describes and analyses online and offline dynamics of the project and shows that while online excitement about the project remained high, the concomitant conservation and development promises and imaginations ill related to offline local realities. This rather 'traditional' conservation and development disjuncture, however, needs to be understood against the system peculiarities of the politics of online 'do-good' 2.0 platforms. The paper concludes that as these peculiarities are significantly intensifying and changing conservation and development dynamics, they do not elude familiar (1.0) disjunctures and might even obscure these further from sight. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:越来越多的交互式“ 2.0”众包平台提高了全球保护和开发项目的知名度和资金。通过实现双向在线协作和交流,这些“保护与发展2.0”平台希望在预算削减和金融危机后对“正式”援助部门普遍批评的情况下,为保护和发展计划提供新的动力和普遍的合法性。危机。本文介绍了荷兰pifworld.com平台上的旗舰“大象走廊”项目的案例,以调查“ 2.0”元素是否以及如何根据这些期望改变了保护和发展。本文描述并分析了该项目的在线和离线动态,并显示了尽管对该项目的在线兴奋仍然很高,但随之而来的保护和发展前景以及与离线本地现实相关的想象力。但是,这种“传统”的保护和发展脱节需要与在线“善行” 2.0平台的政治系统特点相对照来理解。本文的结论是,由于这些特殊性正在显着加剧和改变保护与发展的动态,因此它们并没有消除熟悉的(1.0)分离,甚至可能在视觉上使它们进一步模糊。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Geoforum》 |2017年第2期|163-173|共11页
  • 作者

    Buscher Bram;

  • 作者单位

    Wageningen Univ, Sociol Dev & Change, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands|Univ Johannesburg, Dept Geog Environm Management & Energy Studies, Johannesburg, South Africa|Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Sociol & Social Anthropol, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Conservation; Online activism; New media; Web 2.0; Development; Nature 2.0;

    机译:保护;在线行动;新媒体;Web 2.0;发展;自然2.0;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号