首页> 外文期刊>Genetic Testing >Factors Determining Dissemination of Results and Uptake of Genetic Testing in Families with Known BRCA1/2 Mutations
【24h】

Factors Determining Dissemination of Results and Uptake of Genetic Testing in Families with Known BRCA1/2 Mutations

机译:决定结果传播和遗传测试被已知的BRCA1 / 2突变的家庭的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Uptake of genetic testing remains low, even in families with known BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations, despite effective interventions to reduce risk. We report disclosure and uptake patterns by BRCA1/2-positive individuals to at-risk relatives, in the setting of no-cost genetic counseling and testing. Methods: Relatives of BRCA1/2-positive individuals were offered cost-free and confidential genetic counseling and testing. If positive for a BRCA1/2 mutation, participants were eligible to complete a survey about their disclosure of mutation status and the subsequent uptake of genetic testing by at-risk family members. Results: One hundred and fifteen of 142 eligible individuals responded to the survey (81%). Eighty-eight (77%) of those surveyed disclosed results to all at-risk relatives. Disclosure to first-degree relatives (FDRs) was higher than to second-degree relatives (SDRs) and third-degree relatives (TDR) (95% vs. 78%; p < 0.01). Disclosure rates to male versus female relatives were similar, but reported completion of genetic testing was higher among female versus male FDRs (73% vs. 49%; p < 0.01) and SDRs (68% vs. 43%; p < 0.01), and among members of maternal versus paternal lineages (63% vs. 0%; p < 0.01). Men were more likely than women to express general difficulty discussing positive BCRA1/2 results with at-risk family members (90% vs. 70%; p = 0.03), while women reported more emotional distress associated with disclosure than men (48% vs. 13%; p < 0.01). Discussion: We report a very high rate of disclosure of genetic testing information to at-risk relatives. However, uptake of genetic testing among at-risk individuals was low despite cost-free testing services, particularly in men, SDRs, and members of paternal lineages. The complete lack of testing among paternally related at-risk individuals and the lower testing uptake among men signify a significant barrier to testing and a challenge for genetic counselors and physicians working with high-risk groups. Further research is necessary to ensure that family members understand their risk and the potential benefits of genetic counseling.
机译:背景:尽管采取了有效的干预措施以降低风险,但即使在已知BRCA1和BRCA2(BRCA1 / 2)突变的家庭中,基因检测的使用率仍然很低。我们在无成本遗传咨询和检测的情况下,向处于危险中的亲属报告BRCA1 / 2阳性个体的披露和摄取方式。方法:向BRCA1 / 2阳性个体的亲属提供免费且保密的遗传咨询和检测。如果BRCA1 / 2突变呈阳性,则参与者有资格完成有关其突变状态的披露以及高危家庭成员随后接受基因检测的调查。结果:142名合格个人中有115名回答了调查(81%)。接受调查的人中有88个(77%)向所有有风险的亲戚透露了结果。一级亲属(FDR)的披露高于二级亲属(SDR)和三级亲属(TDR)的披露(95%比78%; p <0.01)。对男性和女性亲属的披露率相似,但据报道,女性对男性FDR(73%对49%; p <0.01)和SDR(68%对43%; p <0.01)的基因检测完成率更高,以及母系与父系血统的成员之间(63%比0%; p <0.01)。与高风险家庭成员讨论BCRA1 / 2阳性结果相比,男性比女性更有可能表达一般困难(90%比70%; p = 0.03),而女性报告与披露相关的情绪困扰比男性多(48%vs 13%; p <0.01)。讨论:我们向有风险的亲属报告了很高的基因检测信息披露率。然而,尽管有免费的测试服务,但在高危人群中进行基因测试的比例仍然很低,尤其是在男性,特别提款权和父系成员中。与父亲相关的高风险个体完全缺乏检测,而男性的检测吸收率较低,这标志着检测的重大障碍以及与高危人群合作的遗传咨询师和医师的挑战。有必要进行进一步的研究,以确保家庭成员了解他们的风险以及遗传咨询的潜在好处。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Genetic Testing》 |2008年第1期|p.81-91|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Esme FinlayDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Jill E. StopferAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Eric BurlingameAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Katherine Goldfeder EvansAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Katherine L. NathansonAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Barbara L. WeberGlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Katrina ArmstrongAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Timothy R. RebbeckAbramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Susan M. DomchekDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Factors Determining Dissemination;

    机译:决定传播的因素;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:43:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号