...
首页> 外文期刊>Fuel >CH_4/air homogeneous autoignition: A comparison of two chemical kinetics mechanisms
【24h】

CH_4/air homogeneous autoignition: A comparison of two chemical kinetics mechanisms

机译:CH_4 /空气均匀自燃:两种化学动力学机制的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Reactions contributing to the generation of the explosive time scale that characterise autoignition of homogeneous stoichiometric CH4/air mixture are identified using two different chemical kinetics models; the well known GRI-3.0 mechanism (53/325 species/reactions with N-chemistry) and the AramcoMech mechanism from NUI Galway (113/710 species/reactions without N-chemistry; Combustion and Flame 162:315-330, 2015). Although the two mechanisms provide qualitatively similar results (regarding ignition delay and profiles of temperature, of mass fractions and of explosive time scale), the 113/710 mechanism was shown to reproduce the experimental data with higher accuracy than the 53/325 mechanism. The present analysis explores the origin of the improved accuracy provided by the more complex kinetics mechanism. It is shown that the reactions responsible for the generation of the explosive time scale differ significantly. This is reflected to differences in the length of the chemical and thermal runaways and in the set of the most influential species.
机译:使用两种不同的化学动力学模型鉴定了导致爆炸时间尺度产生的反应,该反应表征了化学计量均质CH4 /空气混合物的自燃。著名的GRI-3.0机制(53/325种/与N化学反应)和来自NUI戈尔韦的AramcoMech机制(113/710种/与N化学反应; Combustion and Flame 162:315-330,2015)。尽管这两种机制提供的定性结果相似(关于点火延迟和温度曲线,质量分数和爆炸时间刻度),但显示出113/710机制比53/325机制具有更高的准确性。本分析探讨了由更复杂的动力学机制提供的提高的准确性的起源。结果表明,引起爆炸时间尺度产生的反应明显不同。这反映在化学和热失控的长度以及最具影响力的物种的差异上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号