【24h】

Introduction;

机译:介绍;

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the past decade, hedge fund activism has emerged as a new form of corporate governance mechanism that brings about operational, financial, and governance reforms in the corporation. Shareholder activism (Gillan and Starks, 2007; Karpoff, 2001) and more broadly, large investors' monitoring of corporate managers (Shleifer and Vishny, 1986; Grossman and Hart, 1980) are not new phenomena in capital markets around the world. In the United States, institutional investors such as pension funds and mutual funds have been actively engaging in the management of the invested firms since the 1980s with the goal of improving shareholder value. However, the early institutional shareholder activism has been plagued by many regulatory and structural barriers such as free-rider problems and conflict of interest (Black, 1990). As a result, the evidence on the effect of their activist efforts has largely been mixed (Gillan and Starks, 2007).
机译:在过去的十年中,对冲基金激进主义已经成为一种新形式的公司治理机制,它带来了公司的运营,财务和治理改革。股东积极主义(Gillan和Starks,2007; Karpoff,2001),更广泛地说,大投资者对公司经理人的监督(Shleifer和Vishny,1986; Grossman和Hart,1980)在全球资本市场上并不是新现象。在美国,自1980年代以来,养老金基金和共同基金等机构投资者一直积极参与被投资公司的管理,以期提高股东价值。但是,早期的机构股东行动主义受到许多监管和结构性障碍的困扰,例如搭便车问题和利益冲突(Black,1990)。结果,关于他们的激进主义者努力的效果的证据在很大程度上是混杂的(Gillan and Starks,2007)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Foundations and trends in finance》 |2009年第3期|p.1-4|共4页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:21:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号