首页> 外文期刊>Foundations of Science >The Foundationalism–Coherentism Opposition Revisited: The Case for Complementarism
【24h】

The Foundationalism–Coherentism Opposition Revisited: The Case for Complementarism

机译:再论基础主义-一致性主义对立:互补主义的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this paper, I show the complementarity of foundationalism and coherentism with respect to any efficient system of beliefs by means of a distinction between two types of proposition drawn from an analogy with an axiomatic system. This distinction is based on the way a given proposition is acknowledged as true, either by declaration (F-proposition) or by preservation (C-proposition). Within such a perspective, i.e., epistemological complementarism, not only can one see how the usual opposition between foundationalism and coherentism is irrelevant, but furthermore one can appreciate the reciprocal relation between these two theories as they refer to two separate epistemological functions involved in the dynamics of constituting and expanding an epistemic system.
机译:在本文中,我通过从公理系统的类比得出的两种命题之间的区别,来证明基础主义和连贯主义在任何有效的信念体系方面的互补性。这种区别基于给定命题通过声明(F命题)或保留(C命题)被确认为真实的方式。在这种认识论互补主义的视角下,不仅可以看出基础主义和连贯主义之间通常的对立是如何不相关的,而且可以欣赏这两种理论之间的相互关系,因为它们涉及动力学中涉及的两种独立的认识论功能构成和扩展认知系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号