...
首页> 外文期刊>Food in Canada >Another victory for anti-science?
【24h】

Another victory for anti-science?

机译:反科学的另一个胜利?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The United States has just adopted anothet policy that has important implications for Canada. On July 29, 2016 President Obama signed Bill 764 requiring labelling on all foods to indicate whether or not the food contains GMO ingredients. The federal law will override individual state laws such as the one passed in Vermont, which is considered to be more onerous. Under the bill the U.S. Department of Agriculture has two years to draft implementing regulations. While Canada has had a voluntary labelling standard for some years, Canadian regulators have resisted calls for mandatory labelling. While some proponents argue mandatory labelling provides informed choice to consumers, others argue that mandatory labelling doesn't inform, it misleads the consumer by implying that GE foods are inferior or unsafe. After all, why else would government make labelling mandatory?
机译:美国刚刚采取了对加拿大有重要影响的人头保险政策。 2016年7月29日,奥巴马总统签署了764号法案,要求在所有食品上贴标签,以表明该食品是否含有GMO成分。联邦法律将凌驾各个州法律,例如佛蒙特州通过的法律,该法律被认为更加繁重。根据该法案,美国农业部有两年的时间来制定实施法规。尽管加拿大多年来一直采用自愿标签标准,但加拿大监管机构拒绝了强制性标签的要求。虽然一些支持者认为强制性标签为消费者提供了知情选择,但其他人则认为强制性标签没有提供信息,但它暗示GE食品劣等或不安全,从而误导了消费者。毕竟,政府为什么还要强制标签化?

著录项

  • 来源
    《Food in Canada》 |2016年第9期|24-24|共1页
  • 作者

    Ron Doering;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号