...
【24h】

RISCAuthority insight

机译:RISC权威性见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

THE BUILT environment lags behind other areas, such as transport, in its consideration of fire toxicity as part of the material selection requirement - is it time for that to change? In today's civilised society, as we go about our daily business, our wellbeing is afforded many protections against perils of varying types and likelihood. In the case of fire, many of these protections are quite visible and well understood by everyone - they are part of our upbringing: the fire extinguisher in the corridor; the sprinkler head and smoke detector in the ceiling; the hose reel on the wall; and the myriad of signs that denote the presence of fuels, need to control ignition sources, routes of escape, and fire doors - to name but a few.
机译:在考虑将火毒作为材料选择要求的一部分时,BUILT环境落后于其他领域(例如运输),是时候该改变了吗?在当今的文明社会中,当我们开展日常业务时,我们的福祉得到了许多保护,免受各种类型和可能性的危害。在发生火灾的情况下,许多保护措施都是众所周知的,每个人都很好理解-它们是我们成长的一部分:走廊的灭火器;天花板上的喷头和烟雾探测器;墙上的软管卷盘;还有无数种表示存在燃料的标志,需要控制点火源,逃生路线和防火门-仅举几例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号