首页> 外文期刊>Finite Elements in Analysis and Design >A comparison of a finite element only scheme and a BEM/FEM method to compute the elastic-viscoelastic response in composite media
【24h】

A comparison of a finite element only scheme and a BEM/FEM method to compute the elastic-viscoelastic response in composite media

机译:计算复合介质中弹性-粘弹性响应的有限元方案与BEM / FEM方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work is concerned with numerical computational procedures required to determine the mechanical response (displacements, strains and stresses) in composites built up of sectors with both elastic and viscoelastic components, in isothermal conditions. We compare a proposed scheme: a Finite Element Method Only procedure (FEM-only), with a published scheme based on an integrated Boundary Element Method/Finite Element Method (BEM/FEM) scheme. In the former, all the constituents (elastic and viscoelastic) are given a Unite element discretization; whereas in the latter, the constituents are given differentiated discretizations. A novel two tier homogenization is presented: a material mathematical treatment homogenization of the viscoelastic and elastic material properties is developed and implemented resulting in a significantly efficient computational procedure; and a Dirichlet homogeneous series representation (same number of terms and same relaxation times) for all materials considered is used as well The proposed solution structure is not viscoelastic model specific and hence significantly more general. Both model data type and/or experimentally determined data are handled with ease either separately or simultaneously. The comparison is clone on the basis of applying the stated FEM-only strategy to three benchmark type problems presented in the published reference. We show that the F[M-only scheme results match rather well the actual solutions of the three problems, requiring significantly lower mathematical formulating effort and concomitantly a lower programming work. Additionally, it is shown that the FEM-only procedure is general, robust, accurate and stable, requiring relatively small computational times when implemented in personal computers. Two novel benchmark type problems are proposed for which both the analytic solution and the numerical solution are included, in order to illustrate both the generality and the accuracy of the FEM-only proposed method. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved,
机译:这项工作与确定等温条件下由弹性和粘弹性成分的扇形复合材料组成的复合材料中确定机械响应(位移,应变和应力)所需的数值计算程序有关。我们比较了一个提议的方案:仅有限元方法程序(仅FEM),以及基于集成边界元方法/有限元方法(BEM / FEM)方案的已发布方案。在前者中,所有组成部分(弹性和粘弹性)都被赋予了Unite元素离散化;而在后者中,对成分进行了差异化离散化。提出了一种新颖的两层均质化方法:粘弹性和弹性材料特性的材料数学处理均质化方法得到开发和实施,从而产生了非常有效的计算程序;对于所考虑的所有材料,也使用Dirichlet齐次级数表示(相同的项数和相同的弛豫时间)。拟议的解决方案结构不是特定于粘弹性模型的,因此具有更广泛的通用性。模型数据类型和/或实验确定的数据都可以轻松地单独或同时处理。该比较是基于将陈述的仅FEM策略应用于发布的参考文献中提出的三个基准类型问题的基础上进行的。我们表明,仅F [M]方案的结果与三个问题的实际解决方案相当吻合,所需的数学公式编制工作量大大减少,同时编程工作也相应减少。另外,表明仅FEM的过程是通用的,鲁棒的,准确的和稳定的,当在个人计算机中实现时需要相对较少的计算时间。提出了两个新颖的基准类型问题,其中包括解析解和数值解,以说明仅采用FEM的方法的一般性和准确性。 (C)2014 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利,

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号