首页> 外文期刊>Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures >MODAL APPROACH FOR PROCESSING ONE- AND THREE-POINT BEND TEST DATA FOR DSIF-TIME DIAGRAM DETERMINATION. PART Ⅱ—CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS
【24h】

MODAL APPROACH FOR PROCESSING ONE- AND THREE-POINT BEND TEST DATA FOR DSIF-TIME DIAGRAM DETERMINATION. PART Ⅱ—CALCULATIONS AND RESULTS

机译:用于处理一点和三点弯曲测试数据以进行DSIF时间图确定的模态方法。第二部分—计算与结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In Part I of this paper, using the modal superposition method, equations for dynamic SIF calculations are derived for an arbitrary linear model of an impact bend specimen. In this paper (Part Ⅱ), modal parameters and other data which are necessary for the DSIF determination have been calculated for three types of specimen model: the Euler-Bernoulli beam model, and two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) solid models. For the latter two cases, calculations were performed using the finite element program ADINA. Results for the 2D model of the specimen were fitted by polynomials for a wide range of specimen geometry parameters and Poisson's ratio values. Considerable differences were observed between the beam model parameters and the 2D or 3D ones. The differences in results for the 2D and 3D models are small and mainly connected with non-uniformity of the SIF distribution along the front of a through-crack in the 3D solid. Results of processing one- and three-point bend test data reported in the literature are presented. Numerical DSIF values are compared with the experimental ones.
机译:在本文的第一部分中,使用模态叠加法,为冲击弯曲试样的任意线性模型推导了动态SIF计算的方程式。在本文(第二部分)中,已经为三种类型的样本模型(欧拉-伯努利梁模型以及二维(2D)和三维(3D))计算了确定DSIF所需的模态参数和其他数据实体模型。对于后两种情况,使用有限元程序ADINA进行了计算。样本的二维模型的结果通过多项式拟合,适用于各种样本几何参数和泊松比值。在光束模型参数与2D或3D参数之间观察到相当大的差异。 2D和3D模型的结果差异很小,并且主要与3D实体中贯穿裂缝的前端的SIF分布不均匀有关。给出了处理文献报道的一点和三点弯曲测试数据的结果。将DSIF数值与实验值进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号