首页> 外文期刊>Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures >A computational lifetime prediction of a thermal shock experiment. Part II: discussion on difference fatigue criteria
【24h】

A computational lifetime prediction of a thermal shock experiment. Part II: discussion on difference fatigue criteria

机译:热冲击实验的计算寿命预测。第二部分:关于差异疲劳标准的讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The SPLASH experiment has been designed in 198S by the CEA to simulate thermal fatigue due to cooling shocks on steel specimens and is similar to the device reported by Marsh in Ref. [1]. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the application of different fatigue criteria in this case. The fatigue criteria: dissipated energy, Manson Coffin, Park and Nelson, dissipated energy with a pressure term, are determined for the experiment using results from FEM computations presented in the first part of the paper (Part I)~2 and compared with results from uniaxial and multiaxial experiments from literature. The work emphasizes the evolution of the triaxiality ratio during the loading cycle.
机译:CELAS在198S中设计了SPLASH实验,以模拟由于钢试样的冷却冲击而引起的热疲劳,与Marsh在参考文献Ref.1中报道的设备相似。 [1]。本文的目的是讨论在这种情况下不同疲劳标准的应用。疲劳标准:耗散能量,曼森·科芬(Manson Coffin),帕克和纳尔逊(Nelson),具有压力项的耗散能量,是根据本文第一部分(I)〜2中介绍的有限元计算结果确定的,用于实验来自文献的单轴和多轴实验。这项工作强调了在加载周期中三轴比的演变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号