首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance
【24h】

The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance

机译:坐姿不稳时躯干刚度对姿势控制的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper focused on the relationship between trunk stiffness and postural control during unstable seated balancing. We hypothesized that an increase in trunk stiffness would degrade postural control, and further hypothesized that signal dependent noise (SDN), resulting in increased muscle force variability, was responsible for this impairment. Ten subjects balanced on an unstable seat during four randomized conditions: normal balancing (control condition), trunk muscle co-activation (active stiffness), arm muscle co-activation (attention control), and belt (passive stiffness). Center of pressure (CoP) and EMG data were collected during three 20 s trials. Postural control was quantified by CoP velocity (total path divided by sample time in seconds). Trunk muscle co-activation resulted in significantly higher CoP velocity than the control (P < 0.001) and arm co-activation (P < 0.001) conditions. EMG data confirmed that the trunk co-activation condition had significantly higher muscle activity than the control (P = 0.001) and arm co-activation (P = 0.001) conditions. The belt condition, which increases passive trunk stiffness, showed no degraded postural control, but interestingly produced slightly lower levels of trunk muscle activity than the control condition (P < 0.001). Increased active trunk stiffness from muscle co-activation degraded postural control. Since the arm co-activation condition showed no impairment, attention demands cannot explain this result. Furthermore, since passive trunk stiffness from wearing a belt did not affect performance, it is believed that SDN from increased trunk muscle recruitment, and not an altered postural control strategy from increased joint stiffness, was responsible for the impairment.
机译:本文着眼于不稳定坐姿平衡时躯干刚度与姿势控制之间的关系。我们假设躯干刚度的增加会降低姿势控制,并进一步假设信号依赖性噪声(SDN)(导致肌肉力量变异性增加)是造成这种损伤的原因。在以下四个随机条件下,十名受试者在不稳定的座位上保持平衡:正常平衡(控制条件),躯干肌肉共同激活(主动僵硬),手臂肌肉共同激活(注意力控制)和安全带(被动僵硬)。在三个20 s试验期间收集了压力中心(CoP)和EMG数据。通过CoP速度(总路径除以以秒为单位的采样时间)来量化姿势控制。躯干肌肉共激活导致CoP速度明显高于对照组(P <0.001)和手臂共激活(P <0.001)。 EMG数据证实,躯干共激活条件的肌肉活动明显高于对照组(P = 0.001)和手臂共激活(P = 0.001)条件。腰带状态增加了被动躯干的刚度,并未显示出姿势控制的下降,但有趣的是,躯干肌肉的活动水平比对照状态略低(P <0.001)。肌肉共激活增加的活动躯干刚度会降低姿势控制能力。由于手臂共激活条件未显示任何损害,因此注意力需求无法解释该结果。此外,由于佩戴腰带导致的被动躯干僵硬不会影响性能,因此可以认为,躯干肌肉募集增加引起的SDN,以及关节僵硬增加引起的姿势控制策略的改变并未引起损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号