首页> 外文期刊>Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal >Commentary on Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants
【24h】

Commentary on Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

机译:高频振荡通气与常规通气治疗早产儿急性肺功能不全的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This is a commentary on a Cochrane review, published in this issue of EBCH, first published as: Henderson-Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, Offringa M. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Review 2007, Issue 3. Art. No. 2. CD000104.DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000104.pub2. nFurther information for thisCochrane review is available in this issue of EBCH in the accompanying EBCH Summary and Characteristics and Key Findings Tables. Copyright © 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The Cochrane Collaboration
机译:这是对Cochrane评论的评论,该评论发表在本期EBCH上,首次发表为:Henderson-Smart DJ,Cools F,Bhuta T,OffringaM。选择性高频振荡通气与常规通气相比,早产儿急性肺功能不全。 Cochrane系统评价数据库2007,第3期。 2号CD000104.DOI:10.1002 / 14651858.CD000104.pub2。 n本期EBCH随附的EBCH摘要,特征和关键发现表中提供了有关此次Chochrane审查的更多信息。版权所有©2008 The Cochrane Collaboration。由John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.发布。Cochrane合作

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号