首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study
【24h】

Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study

机译:腰椎棘突间功能衰竭的关键分析:一项回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Interspinous devices (IDs) were introduced in the 90s. Since then, they have rapidly become very popular for the minimally invasive treatment of lumbar pain disorders. They feature different shapes and biomechanical characteristics, and are used in the spine degenerative pathologies or as motion segment stabilizers (dynamic stabilization) or to obtain the decompression of neurological structures. The indications seem to be rather narrow and still to be verified in terms of their clinical efficacy. However, IDs are being extensively utilized beyond their classical indications with the inevitable risk of a clinical failure. The aim of the present work was to carry out a critical analysis of the causes of failure in a series of 19 patients. From January 2007 to March 2009, 19 patients with residual painful syndrome after the implantation of IDs were observed. The series includes 11 males and 8 females with a mean age of 53.6 years (range 38–84 years) who were operated on elsewhere and who underwent revision surgery at our hospital. The inclusion criteria were low back pain and/or radiculopathy after the device implantation without improvement of the painful symptomatology, radiculopathy with signs of sensory and motor deficit, intermittent neurogenic claudication, and infection. All patients were thoroughly re-assessed with new standard imaging examinations such as MRI and CT scans, considering the following image features: the position of the device with respect to the spinous processes (X-ray), the intervertebral disc disease of the level operated upon or of the adjacent levels (MRI), the segmental instability (dynamic X-rays), the severity of the canal stenosis (CT). The accurate evaluation of the clinical and imaging parameters revealed three main causes of failure: errors of indication, technical errors and the structural failure of the ID. The most frequent cause of failure was a wrong indication. The results of the study are presented and the causes of failure are discussed in detail.
机译:棘突间装置(ID)于90年代问世。从那时起,它们在腰痛疾病的微创治疗中迅速流行。它们具有不同的形状和生物力学特征,可用于脊柱退行性病变或用作运动节段稳定器(动态稳定)或获得神经结构减压。适应症似乎相当狭窄,尚需就其临床疗效进行验证。但是,ID已被广泛使用,超出了其经典适应症,具有不可避免的临床失败风险。当前工作的目的是对一系列19例患者的失败原因进行严格的分析。从2007年1月至2009年3月,观察到19例ID植入后残留疼痛综合征的患者。该系列包括11例男性和8例女性,平均年龄为53.6岁(范围38-84岁),他们在其他地方接受过手术并且在我们医院接受了翻修手术。入选标准为植入器械后腰痛和/或神经根病,无症状症状改善;神经根神经病,感觉和运动缺陷;间歇性神经源性lau行和感染。考虑到以下图像特征,所有患者均经过新的标准影像学检查(例如MRI和CT扫描)进行了彻底的重新评估,包括以下特征:装置相对于棘突的位置(X射线),手术水平的椎间盘疾病或在相邻水平(MRI)上,节段性不稳定性(动态X射线),管腔狭窄(CT)的严重程度。对临床和影像学参数的准确评估揭示了失败的三个主要原因:指示错误,技术错误和ID的结构失败。最常见的故障原因是错误的指示。介绍了研究结果,并详细讨论了故障原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号