首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Sensitivity to change of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale
【24h】

Sensitivity to change of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale

机译:改变颈部疼痛和残疾量表的敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) is a 20-item instrument to measure neck pain and related disability. The aim of this study was to assess sensitivity to change of the NPAD. A total of 411 participants from 15 general practices in the middle of Germany completed a multidimensional questionnaire including the German version of the NPAD and self-reported demographic and clinical information. Sensitivity to change was analysed by linear regression analysis of the NPAD at follow-up and educational level, age class, depression, anxiety, and deficits in social support, respectively, and by Pearson’s correlation analyses between mean change in NPAD at follow-up and mean change in prognostic markers. Those having more than basic education (regression coefficient −7.2, p < 0.001) and/or being in a younger age class (−2.9, p = 0.020) consistently reported significantly lower average NPAD scores at follow-up compared to those with basic education and/or a older age class. In contrast, those who were classified to be depressed (regression coefficient 2.1, p < 0.001), anxious (1.9, p < 0.001), or having deficits in social support (5.5, p = 0.004) reported significantly higher NPAD scores. Change in depression, anxiety, and social support scale between baseline and follow-up was significantly correlated with change in the NPAD score. Hence, these data are in the direction anticipated across all baseline factors investigated. In conclusion, the NPAD seems to be a sensitive measure for use in clinical practice and future studies of neck pain and related disability.
机译:颈部疼痛和残疾量表(NPAD)是一个20个项目的仪器,用于测量颈部疼痛和相关的残疾。这项研究的目的是评估对NPAD变化的敏感性。来自德国中部15个常规诊所的411名参与者完成了多维问卷,包括NPAD的德语版本以及自我报告的人口统计和临床信息。分别通过随访和教育水平,年龄段,抑郁,焦虑和社会支持不足的线性回归分析对NPAD的变化进行敏感性分析,并通过随访和随访中NPAD平均变化之间的Pearson相关分析进行分析。预后指标的平均变化。与基础教育相比,那些具有基础教育以上(回归系数为-7.2,p <0.001)和/或处于较年轻年龄段(-2.9,p = 0.020)的人始终报告其平均NPAD得分明显较低。和/或较老的年龄段。相反,被归类为抑郁(回归系数2.1,p <0.001),焦虑(1.9,p <0.001)或社会支持不足(5.5,p = 0.004)的人报告NPAD评分明显更高。基线和随访之间抑郁,焦虑和社会支持量的变化与NPAD评分的变化显着相关。因此,这些数据是在所有调查的基线因素中预期的方向。总之,NPAD似乎是用于临床实践和未来颈部疼痛及相关残疾研究的敏感措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号