...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Plastic Surgery >SIEA flap leads to an increase in abdominal seroma rates compared to DIEP flap for breast reconstruction
【24h】

SIEA flap leads to an increase in abdominal seroma rates compared to DIEP flap for breast reconstruction

机译:与用于乳房重建的DIEP皮瓣相比,SIEA皮瓣导致腹部血清肿率增加

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this study, we evaluated the peri-operative abdominal drain volumes and length of hospital admission between our superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) patients to determine whether SIEA flaps were associated with increased post-operative abdominal drainage and length of hospital stay. We studied consecutive patients who had breast reconstruction using either a free SIEA (seven) or DIEP (28) flaps. All patients had abdominal drains inserted, and cumulative drainage measurements were taken every 24 h. Data on patient's age, BMI, length of hospital stay, smoking history, and abdominal fluid drainage were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using a t test (Mann–Whitney). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.029) was observed in the total abdominal drainage between the two groups. The mean drainage volume in the SIEA group was 2,248 ml and 531 ml in the DIEP group. No association was observed between smoking and drainage volume in the DIEP group. Similarly, obesity did not appear to influence drainage volumes in either the SIEA or the DIEP groups. The average length of stay for the SIEA group was 10.4 days and 9.1 days in the DIEP group, although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.351). While abdominal wall morbidity is reduced in patients undergoing an SIEA flap for breast reconstruction, in our series, we found that the SIEA flap was associated with a significant increase in abdominal drain volume relative to the DIEP flap, which translated to an extra day in hospital.
机译:在这项研究中,我们评估了浅表上gas动脉(SIEA)和深部下epi动脉穿孔器(DIEP)患者之间的围手术期腹水量和住院时间,以确定SIEA皮瓣是否与术后腹部增大相关引流和住院时间。我们研究了使用自由SIEA(七个)或DIEP(28)皮瓣进行乳房再造的连续患者。所有患者均插入腹部引流管,每24小时进行一次累积引流测量。收集有关患者年龄,BMI,住院时间,吸烟史和腹腔积液的数据。使用t检验(Mann-Whitney)进行统计分析。两组之间的总腹部引流差异有统计学意义(P = 0.029)。 SIEA组的平均引流量为2,248 ml,DIEP组的为531 ml。在DIEP组中,吸烟与引流量之间没有关联。同样,在SIEA或DIEP组中,肥胖似乎都没有影响排水量。 SIEA组的平均住院时间为10.4天,DIEP组的平均住院时间为9.1天,尽管这在统计学上没有统计学意义(P = 0.351)。尽管在进行SIEA皮瓣乳房重建的患者中腹壁发病率降低了,但在我们的系列研究中,我们发现,相对于DIEP皮瓣,SIEA皮瓣与腹腔引流量的显着增加有关,这意味着医院多了一天的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号