首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries
【24h】

How stable is labour market dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries

机译:劳动力市场二元化有多稳定? 九个欧洲国家的就业保护改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Labour market segmentation is at the forefront of national and European policy debates. While the European Commission and the OECD claim to promote what they see as more inclusive policies, academic observers remain sceptical. The dualization literature in particular points to stable equilibria that sustain divisions between labour market insiders and outsiders. In this article, we trace recent reform trajectories in a diverse group of nine European countries marked by a high share of temporary employment: France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden. Our case studies show that recent reforms of employment regulation involve much more dynamism than one would expect based on the experiences of the two preceding decades, or from dualization or insider–outsider theories. The reform trajectories display rather contradictory approaches, sometimes in close succession.
机译:劳动力市场细分位于国家和欧洲政策辩论的最前沿。 虽然欧洲委员会和经合组织声称促进他们认为更具包容性政策的措施,但学术观察员仍然持怀疑态度。 对二元化文献特别是指向稳定的均衡,劳动力市场内部人员和外人之间的划分。 在本文中,我们追溯了一系列九个欧洲国家的最新改革轨迹,标志着临时就业的高度份额:法国,德国,意大利,荷兰,波兰,葡萄牙,斯洛文尼亚,西班牙和瑞典。 我们的案例研究表明,最近的就业监管改革涉及比一年二十年的两年的经验,或从两国或内部局外理论的经验所期望的更大的活力。 改革轨迹展示了相当矛盾的方法,有时候在紧密继承中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号