...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of engineering education >A comparative evaluation of analytical methods to allocate individual marks from a team mark
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of analytical methods to allocate individual marks from a team mark

机译:从团队标记分配单个标记的分析方法的比较评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study presents a comparative evaluation of analytical methods to allocate individual marks from a team mark. Only the methods that use or can be converted into some form of mathematical equations are analysed. Some of these methods focus primarily on the assessment of the quality of teamwork product (product assessment) while the others put greater emphasis on the assessment of teamwork performance (process assessment). The remaining methods try to strike a balance between product assessment and process assessment. To discuss the characteristics of these methods, graphical plots generated by the mathematical equations that collectively cover all possible team learning scenarios are discussed. Finally, a typical teamwork example is used to simplify the discussions. Although each of the methods discussed has its own merits for a particular application scenario, recent methods are relatively better in terms of a number of evaluation criteria.
机译:这项研究提出了从团队标记分配单个标记的分析方法的比较评估。仅分析使用或可以转换为某种形式的数学方程式的方法。其中一些方法主要集中于团队产品质量的评估(产品评估),而其他方法则更着重于团队绩效的评估(过程评估)。其余方法试图在产品评估和过程评估之间取得平衡。为了讨论这些方法的特性,讨论了由数学方程式生成的图形图,这些图形图共同覆盖了所有可能的团队学习场景。最后,使用一个典型的团队合作示例来简化讨论。尽管所讨论的每种方法对于特定的应用场景都有其优点,但是就许多评估标准而言,最近的方法相对更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号