首页> 外文期刊>European journal of engineering education >Application of Bologna cycle programme structures and the European credit transfer system to lrish civil engineering programmes
【24h】

Application of Bologna cycle programme structures and the European credit transfer system to lrish civil engineering programmes

机译:博洛尼亚周期计划结构与欧洲信用转移系统在爱尔兰土木工程方案中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study was to assess, through a cross-institutional comparison, whether higher education institutions in the Republic of Ireland have responded to Bologna Declaration first- and second-cycle programme restructuring and applied the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) to similarly-accredited civil engineering programmes in a consistent manner. Assessment strategies were also examined. The predominant programme structure was the pre-Bologna '4+1' structure, demonstrating limited national impact of the principles underpinning the Bologna Declaration cycle concept. The first-cycle programmes differed widely in terms of allocated student workload per ECTS credit as well as in the way that educational outcomes were assessed, which was primarily by written examination. There was no 'best' (or consensus) practice for applying the two-cycle programme structure or ECTS workload norms. This lack of national consensus reveals issues that may have relevance in other countries, 20 years after the signing of the Bologna Declaration.
机译:本研究的目的是通过跨机构比较评估爱尔兰共和国的高等教育机构是否回应了博洛尼亚宣言第一和第二周期计划重组,并应用欧洲信用转移系统(ECTS)以类似 - 以一致的方式自我制定的土木工程计划。还检查了评估策略。主要的计划结构是博洛尼亚前的4 + 1'结构,展示了基于博洛尼亚申报周期概念的原则的有限国家影响。第一周期计划在分配的学生工作量方面不同,以便评估教育结果的方式,主要是通过书面审查。应用双周期程序结构或ECTS工作量规范没有“最佳”(或共识)实践。这种缺乏国家共识揭示了在博洛尼亚宣言签署后20年的其他国家可能具有相关性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号