首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Communication >'let's Talk About Europe': Why Europeanization Shows A Different Face In Different Newspapers
【24h】

'let's Talk About Europe': Why Europeanization Shows A Different Face In Different Newspapers

机译:“让我们谈论欧洲”:为什么欧洲化在不同的报纸上表现出不同的面孔

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article contributes to the ongoing quest for a European public sphere understood as a structural transformation of national public debates. This process of Europeanization of national public spheres has a vertical and a horizontal dimension: an increased focus on the EU as well as more attention to other European countries. A content analysis of quality newspapers in five EU member states covering a period of 20 years reveals common trends across different countries but no convergence over time. Four different patterns of Europeanization can be identified: comprehensive Europeanization, segmented Europeanization, Europeanization aloof from the EU and a parochial public sphere. This article pushes research in this area ahead by identifying and testing factors that explain these differences in newspaper coverage. In-depth case analysis as well as regression analysis show that the editorial mission of a newspaper and the size of the member state it is situated in have a significant effect on patterns of Europeanization. Contrary to common expectations, the number of correspondents in Brussels and the degree of popular identification with Europe did not significantly affect patterns of Europeanization.
机译:本文有助于不断寻求欧洲公共领域,这被理解为国家公共辩论的结构性转变。国家公共领域的欧洲化进程具有纵向和横向两个方面:越来越关注欧盟,更多地关注其他欧洲国家。对五个欧盟成员国长达20年的优质报纸进行的内容分析显示,不同国家/地区存在共同的趋势,但随着时间的推移并没有趋同。可以确定四种不同的欧洲化模式:全面的欧洲化,分段的欧洲化,与欧盟隔离的欧洲化和狭public的公共领域。本文通过识别和测试可解释报纸报道中这些差异的因素来推动该领域的研究。深入的案例分析和回归分析表明,报纸的编辑使命及其所处成员国的规模对欧洲化模式具有重大影响。与普遍的期望相反,布鲁塞尔的通讯员数量和与欧洲的普遍认同程度并未显着影响欧洲化模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号