首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Communication >Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
【24h】

Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success

机译:全球选举活动中的负面,情绪化和民粹主义言论及其对媒体关注度和选举成功的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Very little is known in broad comparative terms about the nature and content of election campaigns. In this article, we present the first systematic and comparative assessment of the electoral campaigns of candidates having competed in elections across the world along three dimensions: negative campaigning, emotional campaigning and populist rhetoric. We do so by introducing a new dataset, based on expert judgements, that allows us to retrace the content of campaigns of 97 candidates having competed in 43 elections worldwide between 2016 and 2018. To put the importance of these three dimensions of electoral campaigns into perspective, we comparatively assess the extent to which these three dimensions are more or less likely to capture the attention of news media and to determine the electoral fate of those who rely on them. Our analyses reveal that negativity and emotionality significantly and substantially drive media coverage and electoral results: more positive and enthusiasm-based campaigns increase media attention, but so do campaigns based on personal attacks and fear appeals, especially during presidential elections and when the number of competing candidates is lower. Looking at electoral success, negativity backlashes overall, and yet personal attacks can be used successfully to increase the chances of an electoral victory. Furthermore, both appeals to enthusiasm (but not when a lot of candidates compete) and fear (especially in presidential elections) work as intended to capture the attention of the public and transform it into better electoral fortunes. We also discuss the results of a case study of the 2017 French presidential election, where we compare the campaigns of four leading candidates (Emmanuel Macron, Marine Le Pen, François Fillon and Jean-Luc Mélenchon); results of the case study offer interesting insights to understand the general trends, and beyond.
机译:就选举活动的性质和内容而言,从广义的比较术语上了解得很少。在本文中,我们从三个方面对否决候选人的竞选活动进行了首次系统性和比较性评估:消极竞选活动,情感竞选活动和民粹主义言论。为此,我们引入了一个基于专家判断的新数据集,该数据集使我们能够追溯在2016年至2018年间参加过全球43次选举的97位候选人的竞选活动的内容。 ,我们比较地评估了这三个方面或多或少会在多大程度上吸引新闻媒体的注意力并确定依靠它们的人的选举命运。我们的分析表明,消极情绪和情感情绪在很大程度上推动了媒体的报道和选举结果:基于积极和热情的竞选活动增加了媒体的关注度,但基于人身攻击和恐惧呼吁的竞选活动也是如此,尤其是在总统大选期间以及候选人较低。纵观选举成功,消极情绪总体上是反冲的,但是人身攻击可以成功地用于增加选举胜利的机会。此外,这两种方法都是为了激发热情(但当许多候选人竞争时却没有)和恐惧(尤其是在总统选举中)都旨在吸引公众的注意,并将其转化为更好的选举命运。我们还讨论了2017年法国总统大选的案例研究结果,我们在此比较了四位主要候选人的竞选活动(伊曼纽尔·马克龙,马林·勒庞,弗朗索瓦·菲永和让·卢克·梅伦雄);案例研究的结果提供了有趣的见解,以了解总体趋势以及其他趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号