首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >To Buy or Not to Buy: The Use of a Trade Mark as a Communication Tool Rather than as a Link between a Product and its Source-a Further Consideration of the Concept of Dilution
【24h】

To Buy or Not to Buy: The Use of a Trade Mark as a Communication Tool Rather than as a Link between a Product and its Source-a Further Consideration of the Concept of Dilution

机译:买还是不买:使用商标作为一种沟通工具,而不是产品与其来源之间的联系,这是对稀释概念的进一步考虑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The concept of dilution was substantially restricted following the introduction, in the case of Intel Corp Inc v CPM UK Ltd, of a requirement that to establish detriment to the distinctive character of an earlier mark for the purposes of art. 4(4) (a) of Trade Mark Directive 89/104 it was necessary to demonstrate a change in the average consumer's economic behaviour. This article analyses and questions the rationale behind the introduction of this requirement and further questions the basis of the General Court's subsequent interpretation of Intel in the case of Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM.
机译:在英特尔公司诉CPM UK Ltd案中,对稀释的概念提出了严格的限制,该要求是为艺术目的而损害早期商标的鲜明特征。 89/104号商标指令第4(4)(a)条有必要证明普通消费者的经济行为发生了变化。本文分析并质疑引入此要求的背后原因,并进一步质疑一般法院对环境制造LLP诉OHIM一案对英特尔的后续解释的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号