首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >CJEU Ruling in Pinckney v Mediatech: Jurisdiction in Online Copyright Infringement Cases Depends on the Accessibility of Website Content
【24h】

CJEU Ruling in Pinckney v Mediatech: Jurisdiction in Online Copyright Infringement Cases Depends on the Accessibility of Website Content

机译:CJEU在Pinckney诉Mediatech案中的裁决:在线版权侵权案件的管辖权取决于网站内容的可访问性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Pinckney v KDG Mediatech AG, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on October 3, 2013 on the question of online cross-border copyright infringement. It considered that courts of Member States in which copyright works were protected and in which the "harmful event" had occurred, or might occur, were competent to determine liability and damage caused in that territory. The court ruled that there was a likelihood of the harmful event arising in a territory where it was possible to obtain infringing copies of works from websites accessible in that territory. The CJEU considered that the relevant question for determining where the harmful event took place was to ask whether copies of copyright works were made accessible online in the Member State of the court seised rather than ask whether the activity of a website was "directed to" the Member State of the court seised.
机译:在Pinckney诉KDG Mediatech AG一案中,欧盟法院(CJEU)于2013年10月3日就在线跨界版权侵权问题做出裁决。它认为,受版权保护并已发生或可能发生“有害事件”的成员国法院,有权确定在该领土上引起的赔偿责任和损害。法院裁定,有可能在该领土上发生有害事件,该领土有可能从该领土上可访问的网站获得侵权作品的副本。欧盟法院认为,确定有害事件发生地点的相关问题是询问是否在被扣押的法院成员国中在线获取版权作品的副本,而不是询问网站的活动是否“指向”了该网站。法院成员国被没收。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号